Cited by 300Cancer survivorship and careProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Exercise for men with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Bourke, Liam, Smith, Dianna, Steed, Liz, Hooper, Richard, Carter, Anouska, Catto, James, Albertsen, Peter C., Tombal, Bertrand +2 more·2016·European Urology

Abstract

Context Exercise could be beneficial for prostate cancer survivors. However, no systematic review across cancer stages and treatment types addressing potential benefits and harms exists to date.Objective To assess the effects of exercise on cancer-specific quality of life and adverse events in prostate cancer trials.Evidence acquisition We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and PEDro. We also searched grey literature databases, including trial registers. Searches were from database inception to March 2015. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for meta-analysis.Evidence synthesis We included 16 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1574 men with prostate cancer. Follow-up varied from 8 wk to 12 mo. RCTs involved men with stage I-IV cancers. A high risk of bias was frequently due to problematic intervention adherence. Seven trials involving 912 men measured cancer-specific quality of life. Pooling of the data from these seven trials revealed no significant effect on this outcome (SMD 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.08 to 0.34, median follow-up 12 wk). Sensitivity analysis of studies that were judged to be of high quality indicated a moderate positive effect estimate (SMD 0.33, 95% CI 0.08-0.58; median follow-up 12 wk). Similar beneficial effects were seen for cancer-specific fatigue, submaximal fitness, and lower body strength. We found no evidence of benefit for disease progression, cardiovascular health, or sexual function. There were no deaths attributable to exercise interventions. Other serious adverse events (eg, myocardial infarction) were equivalent to those seen in controls.Conclusions These results support the hypothesis that exercise interventions improve cancer-specific quality of life, cancer-specific fatigue, submaximal fitness, and lower body strength.Patient summary This review shows that exercise/physical activity interventions can improve quality of life, fatigue, fitness, and function for men with prostate cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.047

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bourke, L., Smith, D., Steed, L., Hooper, R., Carter, A., Catto, J., Albertsen, P. C., Tombal, B., Payne, H. A., & Rosario, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • UConn Health (US)
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
  • University College Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Bourke, Liam
Venue
European Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
693-703
ISSN
0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2178014981
Cited by
300
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0609-10181, RP-DG-1213-10010)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
prostate cancer, exercise intervention, physical activity, cancer-specific quality of life, lower limb strength, adverse events, prostate cancer survivors, cardiovascular health, sexual function
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Fatigue, Health Status, Humans, Male, Neoplasm Staging, Physical Fitness, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Chi-Square Distribution, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review