Cited by 440Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementCancer Risks and Factors

Benefits of supervised group exercise programme for women being treated for early stage breast cancer: pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Open access
Mutrie, Nanette, Campbell, Anna M, Whyte, Fiona, McConnachie, Alex, Emslie, Carol, Lee, Laura, Kearney, Nora, Walker, Andrew +1 more·2007·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine functional and psychological benefits of a 12 week supervised group exercise programme during treatment for early stage breast cancer, with six month follow-up. DESIGN: Pragmatic randomised controlled prospective open trial. SETTING: Three National Health Service oncology clinics in Scotland and community exercise facilities. PARTICIPANTS: 203 women entered the study; 177 completed the six month follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Supervised 12 week group exercise programme in addition to usual care, compared with usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) questionnaire, Beck depression inventory, positive and negative affect scale, body mass index, seven day recall of physical activity, 12 minute walk test, and assessment of shoulder mobility. RESULTS: Mixed effects models with adjustment for baseline values, study site, treatment at baseline, and age gave intervention effect estimates (intervention minus control) at 12 weeks of 129 (95% confidence interval 83 to 176) for metres walked in 12 minutes, 182 (75 to 289) for minutes of moderate intensity activity reported in a week, 2.6 (1.6 to 3.7) for shoulder mobility, 2.5 (1.0 to 3.9) for breast cancer specific subscale of quality of life, and 4.0 (1.8 to 6.3) for positive mood. No significant effect was seen for general quality of life (FACT-G), which was the primary outcome. At the six month follow-up, most of these effects were maintained and an intervention effect for breast cancer specific quality of life emerged. No adverse effects were noted. CONCLUSION: Supervised group exercise provided functional and psychological benefit after a 12 week intervention and six months later. Clinicians should encourage activity for their patients. Policy makers should consider the inclusion of exercise opportunities in cancer rehabilitation services. Trial registration Current controlled trials ISRCTN12587864 [controlled-trials.com].

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.39094.648553.ae

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Campbell A, Whyte F, Mutrie N. Strategies to improve recruitment to an exercise intervention during breast cancer treatment. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing 2007;9:211-3.
  2. Halverstadt A, Leonard A. Essential exercises for breast cancer survivors. Boston Massachusetts: Harvard Common Press, 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mutrie, N., Campbell, A. M., Whyte, F., McConnachie, A., Emslie, C., Lee, L., Kearney, N., Walker, A., & Ritchie, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit (GB)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Mutrie, Nanette
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-02-16
Volume
334
Issue
7592
Pages
517
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2133026620
Cited by
440
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 30
FWCI
17.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
supervised group exercise, early breast cancer, cancer rehabilitation, quality of life, physical activity, depression, mood, shoulder range of motion, walking distance, body mass index, women with cancer
MeSH terms
Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review