The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Associations among false-belief understanding, executive function, and social competence: A longitudinal analysis
Open accessAbstract
A growing number of studies demonstrate associations among false-belief understanding (FBU), executive function (EF), and social competence. This study extends previous studies by exploring longitudinal associations among FBU and its correlates within a low-income sample of preschoolers attending Head Start. Sixty-eight children (time 1 mean age = 5 years 2 months) were assessed over their preschool and kindergarten years. Results indicated bidirectional relations between FBU and social competence; FBU in preschool was positively associated with social competence in kindergarten and social competence in preschool was positively associated with FBU in kindergarten. Preschool EF was positively associated with social competence both in preschool and kindergarten and with FBU in preschool. Mediation analyses suggest that the bidirectional longitudinal link between FBU and social competence was independent of EF. These findings extend the FBU literature by examining its development and correlates in early childhood. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values
Little, R. J. A. (1988) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722 · Cited by 8,963
Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ?
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8 · Cited by 8,599
Wimmer, H. (1983) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5 · Cited by 6,305
Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2412 · Cited by 3,670
The Perceived Competence Scale for Children
Harter, S. (1982) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1129640 · Cited by 3,639
Pretense and representation: The origins of "theory of mind."
Leslie, A. M. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.4.412 · Cited by 3,379
Executive functions and developmental psychopathology.
Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01380.x · Cited by 3,150 · cited 1×
“EF has been linked with self-regulation (Cole, Usher, & Cargo, 1993), and impairments in EF have been consistently reported for childhood disorders including autism and ADHD (for review, see Pennington & Ozonoff, 1996).”
BackgroundBlair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x · Cited by 3,140
Self-citationIndividual Differences in Inhibitory Control and Children's Theory of Mind
Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00333 · Cited by 2,072
Cited by
Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x · Cited by 1,248
Executive function and metacognition: Towards a unifying framework of cognitive self-regulation
Roebers, C. M. (2017) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2017.04.001 · Cited by 592
Bagetta (2016) · doi:10.1111/mbe.12100 · Cited by 433
Zhou, Q., Chen, S. H., & Main, A. (2012) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00176.x · Cited by 397
What is “theory of mind”? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences
Apperly, I. A. (2012) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.676055 · Cited by 368
Silent Films and Strange Stories: Theory of Mind, Gender, and Social Experiences in Middle Childhood
Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2013) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12017 · Cited by 332
Lillard, A. S. (2012) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2012.01.001 · Cited by 224
Friendlessness and theory of mind: A prospective longitudinal study
Fink, E., Begeer, S., Peterson, C. C., Slaughter, V., & de Rosnay, M. (2015) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.12060 · Cited by 165
Mary, A., Slama, H., Mousty, P., Massat, I., Capiau, T., Drabs, V., & Peigneux, P. (2016) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2015.1012491 · Cited by 120
Mind reading skills and empathy: Evidence for nice and nasty ToM behaviours in school-aged children
Lonigro, A., Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., & Baumgartner, E. (2014) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-013-9722-5 · Cited by 83
Cassidy, A. R. (2016) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2014.994484 · Cited by 37
Hubert, B., Guimard, P., & Florin, A. (2017) · PsyCh Journal · doi:10.1002/pchj.160 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Razza, R. A., & Blair, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 332-343
- ISSN
- 0193-3973 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994752175
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.