Cited by 105Consumer Behavior and Market DynamicsConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationConsumer behavior in food and health

Consumers as four-faced creatures. Looking at food consumption from the perspective of contemporary consumers

Open access
Dagevos, Hans·2005·Appetite

Abstract

One would believe that with the increasing importance attached to consumers in contemporary affluent societies, the difficulty to understand today's 'butterfly' or 'unmanageable' consumers seems to double simultaneously. Modern consumers defy traditional segmentation by age, gender or income. Classical criteria to distinguish different homogeneous groups of consumers with corresponding behavioral intentions and patterns, have lost much of their explanatory power. Hence, the behaviour of the inhabitants of modern consumer society can no longer be understood by 'straight' and measurable segmentation criteria only. In order to meet the complexities of modern consumer behaviour, it is suggested that we need to improve our understanding of socio-cultural and socio-psychological influences on consumer choices. Such are awarded to be supplementary to socio-demographic (e.g. age, gender) or socio-economic (e.g. income, occupation) criteria, which are traditionally used in consumer studies. Our contribution to this quest for new perspectives, in which consumption is both seen as an economic/materialistic and a socio-cultural/attitudinal phenomenon, is called the consumer images approach. The underpinnings of this approach are the dimensions materialism/nonmaterialism and individualism/collectivism. Based on these two dimensions, four consumer images are distinguished in a four-quadrantic continuum. This implies that consumer images are not another set of taxonomies to 'box in' consumers. The consumer images approach is in tune with lines of thought in the recent renaissance of the sociology of consumption. To illustrate this, a presentation of the multifaceted consumer will be given that is interlarded with quotations from several new studies on contemporary consumerism which give evidence of the current vitality of scholarly interest in consumption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2005.03.006

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dagevos, H.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Dagevos, Hans
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
32-39
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132628577
Cited by
105
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
16.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer Behavior and Market Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
Keywords
customer segmentation, consumer behavior, individualism-collectivism, sociology of consumption, dietary intake, consumer typology
MeSH terms
Choice Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Feeding Behavior, Food Preferences, Humans, Income

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review