Cited by 27Media Influence and HealthNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBehavioral Health and Interventions

The audience eats more if a movie character keeps eating: An unconscious mechanism for media influence on eating behaviors

Zhou, Shuo, Shapiro, Michael A., Wansink, Brian·2017·Appetite

Abstract

Media's presentation of eating is an important source of influence on viewers' eating goals and behaviors. Drawing on recent research indicating that whether a story character continues to pursue a goal or completes a goal can unconsciously influence an audience member's goals, a scene from a popular movie comedy was manipulated to end with a character continuing to eat (goal ongoing) or completed eating (goal completed). Participants (N = 147) were randomly assigned to a goal status condition. As a reward, after viewing the movie clip viewers were offered two types of snacks: ChexMix and M&M's, in various size portions. Viewers ate more food after watching the characters continue to eat compared to watching the characters complete eating, but only among those manipulated to identify with a character. Viewers were more likely to choose savory food after viewing the ongoing eating scenes, but sweet dessert-like food after viewing the completed eating scenes. The results extend the notion of media influence on unconscious goal contagion and satiation to movie eating, and raise the possibility that completing a goal can activate a logically subsequent goal. Implications for understanding media influence on eating and other health behaviors are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.028

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People may mimic behaviors without ever consciously realizing that they do so.

    “People may mimic behaviors without ever consciously realizing that they do so (Zhou et al., 2017).”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Zhou et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, S., Shapiro, M. A., & Wansink, B.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Shuo
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
108
Pages
407-415
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2538071619
Cited by
27
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
17.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2019-02-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
goal achievement, satiation, film characters, character identification, dietary habits, snacking, food choice
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Choice Behavior, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Male, Motion Pictures, Surveys and Questionnaires, Satiation, Health Behavior, Young Adult, Snacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review