Cited by 132Behavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and HealthEmotions and Moral Behavior

You Wear Me Out: The Vicarious Depletion of Self-Control

Open access
Ackerman, Joshua M., Goldstein, Noah J., Shapiro, Jenessa R., Bargh, John A.·2009·Psychological Science

Abstract

Acts of self-control may deplete an individual's self-regulatory resources. But what are the consequences of perceiving other people's use of self-control? Mentally simulating the actions of others has been found to elicit psychological effects consistent with the actual performance of those actions. Here, we consider how simulating versus merely perceiving the use of willpower can affect self-control abilities. In Study 1 , participants who simulated the perspective of a person exercising self-control exhibited less restraint over spending on consumer products than did other participants. In Study 2 , participants who took the perspective of a person using self-control exerted less willpower on an unrelated lexical generation task than did participants who took the perspective of a person who did not use self-control. Conversely, participants who merely read about another person's self-control exerted more willpower than did those who read about actions not requiring self-control. These findings suggest that the actions of other people may either deplete or boost one's own self-control, depending on whether one mentally simulates those actions or merely perceives them.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02290.x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ackerman, J. M., Goldstein, N. J., Shapiro, J. R., & Bargh, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Ackerman, Joshua M.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2009-03
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
326-332
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2150911794
Cited by
132
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
13.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH060767, MH60767)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
self-control, self-regulation, mental simulation, perspective taking, willpower, ego depletion
MeSH terms
Fatigue, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Vocabulary, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review