The DOI matches its Crossref record; 140 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The psychology of vegetarianism: Recent advances and future directions
Abstract
Whereas vegetarianism has long garnered attention from nutritional science and philosophy, psychological research exploring this eating behavior has emerged only in the past few decades. Six years ago, Ruby (2012) reviewed the extant literature on the psychology of vegetarianism, showcasing its promise as "a blossoming field of study." In the time since, this line of research truly has blossomed, as subsequent work has addressed prior knowledge gaps and initiated new lines of inquiry. While evidence on previously studied topics of dietary motivation, moral values, gender, differences between vegetarians and vegans, barriers to dietary change, and disordered eating has continued to expand, new lines of research on identity, social experiences, flexitarianism, culture, and prospective vegetarianism have emerged. Recent psychometric advancements, moreover, have constructed useful measures to assess relevant constructs. The current review synthesizes this amalgam of research, identifying emergent themes and highlighting promising directions for future inquiry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241 · cited 1×
“While much is known about how these moral values may shape people's eating behaviors, less is known about how people might revise their moral values after altering their dietary habits, as selfperception theory would suggest can occur (Bem, 1972).”
BackgroundThe sexual politics of meat: a feminist-vegetarian critical theory
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-3347 · Cited by 1,417
Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study
Ruby, M. B. (2012) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.019 · Cited by 887
Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns
Piazza, J., Ruby, M. B., Loughnan, S., Luong, M., Kulik, J., Watkins, H. M., & Seigerman, M. (2015) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011 · Cited by 768
Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption.
Rothgerber, H. (2013) · Psychology of Men & Masculinity · doi:10.1037/a0030379 · Cited by 566
Attached to meat? (Un)Willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based diet
Graça, J., Calheiros, M. M., & Oliveira, A. (2015) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.024 · Cited by 526
Health, ethics and environment: A qualitative study of vegetarian motivations
Fox, N., & Ward, K. (2008) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.007 · Cited by 503
The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals
Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., & Bastian, B. (2010) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.043 · Cited by 488
Stoll-Kleemann, S., & Schmidt, U. J. (2017) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-016-1057-5 · Cited by 481
Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs, and Wear Cows: An Introduction to Carnism
Joy, M. S. (2009) · Cited by 478
Cited by
Graça, J., Godinho, C. A., & Truninger, M. (2019) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.046 · Cited by 447
Vegetarianism as a social identity
Nezlek, J. B., & Forestell, C. A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2019.12.005 · Cited by 187
Perceptions of Vegan Food among Organic Food Consumers Following Different Diets
Kilian, D., & Hamm, U. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13179794 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenfeld, D. L.
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 131
- Pages
- 125-138
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2891084624
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 140
- FWCI
- 17.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The psychology of vegetarianism: Recent advances and future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.011
- The paper
- Rosenfeld, D. L. (2018). The psychology of vegetarianism: Recent advances and future directions. Appetite. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.