The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“If I became a vegan, my family and friends would hate me:” Anticipating vegan stigma as a barrier to plant-based diets
Abstract
A significant body of literature has developed which examines why meat consumption continues to be so important to Americans. Our paper contributes to this literature by examining how fear of stigmatization may be a barrier to avoiding meat consumption. This is an important subject because there is evidence that suggests that individuals who avoid meat, especially vegans, are stigmatized for disrupting social conventions related to food. In this paper, we present data from a series of focus groups in which vegan, vegetarian, and omnivorous college students discussed perceptions of vegans and veganism. Our analysis shows that non-vegans anticipate stigma associated with eating like vegans. We identify two strategies by which non-vegans attempt to avoid this stigma: social and behavioral distancing. These results suggest that vegan stigma is a barrier that inhibits dietary shifts toward a plant-based diet. Our results are important because they can be used to improve the efficacy of public health initiatives focused on encouraging plant-based diet adoption and meat consumption reduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity
(1969) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.45.527.642 · Cited by 14,231
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research
Morgan, D. (1997) · doi:10.4135/9781412984287 · Cited by 8,863
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363 · Cited by 8,848
Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity.
DeFleur, M. L., & Goffman, E. (1964) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575995 · Cited by 6,420
Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015 · Cited by 6,077
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research
Kawamura, H., & Morgan, D. L. (1998) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/330238 · Cited by 2,800
Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance.
Link, B. G., Phelan, J. C., Bresnahan, M., Stueve, A., & Pescosolido, B. A. (1999) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.89.9.1328 · Cited by 1,949 · cited 1×
“Individuals can accomplish this through building social distance—or refusing to interact with those that are stigmatized (Link et al., 1999).”
BackgroundThe sexual politics of meat: a feminist-vegetarian critical theory
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-3347 · Cited by 1,417
Feeding the Family: The Social Organization of Caring as Gendered Work.
Ciurea, M., & DeVault, M. (1993) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2524247 · Cited by 1,266
Getting the Focus and the Group: Enhancing Analytical Rigor in Focus Group Research
Kidd, P. S., & Parshall, M. B. (2000) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973200129118453 · Cited by 1,013
Cited by
Minority influence in climate change mitigation
Bolderdijk, J. W., & Jans, L. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.02.005 · Cited by 59
Modelling Attitude towards Consumption of Vegan Products
Miguel, I., Coelho, A., & Bairrada, C. M. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13010009 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Markowski, K. L., & Roxburgh, S.
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 135
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2908132104
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 9.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “If I became a vegan, my family and friends would hate me:” Anticipating vegan stigma as a barrier to plant-based diets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.appet.2018.12.040
- The paper
- Markowski, K. L., & Roxburgh, S. (2019). “If I became a vegan, my family and friends would hate me:” Anticipating vegan stigma as a barrier to plant-based diets. Appetite. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.12.040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.