Cited by 153Gut microbiota and healthAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 209 of the 209 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inflammatory pathways in Alzheimer’s disease mediated by gut microbiota

Qian, Xiao-hang, Song, Xiao-xuan, Liu, Xiao-li, Chen, Sheng-di, Tang, Hui-dong·2021·Ageing Research Reviews

Abstract

In the past decade, numerous studies have demonstrated the close relationship between gut microbiota and the occurrence and development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the specific mechanism is still unclear. Both the neuroinflammation and systemic inflammation serve as the key hubs to accelerate the process of AD by promoting pathology and damaging neuron. What's more, the gut microbiota is also crucial for the regulation of inflammation. Therefore, this review focused on the role of gut microbiota in AD through inflammatory pathways. Firstly, this review summarized the relationship and interaction among gut microbiota, inflammation, and AD. Secondly, the direct and indirect regulatory effects of gut microbiota on AD through inflammatory pathways were described. These effects were mainly mediated by the component of the gut microbiota (lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and amyloid peptides), the metabolites of bacteria (short-chain fatty acids, branched amino acids, and neurotransmitters) and functional by-products (bile acids). In addition, potential treatments (fecal microbiota transplantation, antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, and dietary interventions) for AD were also discussed through these mechanisms. Finally, according to the current research status, the key problems to be solved in the future studies were proposed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101317

Cites

209 of 209 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 209 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. van der Kant, 2020, Amyloid-β-independent regulators of tau pathology in Alzheimer disease. Nature reviews, Neuroscience, 21, 21

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Qian, X.-H., Song, X.-X., Liu, X.-L., Chen, S.-D., & Tang, H.-D.
Venue
Ageing Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
68
Pages
101317
ISSN
1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134448216
Cited by
153
References
209
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 7
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, gut microbiota, neuroinflammation, systemic inflammation, lipopolysaccharide, amyloid peptides, short-chain fatty acids, branched-chain amino acids, neurotransmitters, bile acids, fecal microbiota transplantation, probiotics, prebiotics, dietary intervention, antibiotics
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Humans, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review