Unlocking the blood–brain barrier: Can low-intensity focused ultrasound enable effective delivery of anti-amyloid and anti-tau antibodies in Alzheimer’s disease?
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains a major unmet medical challenge despite decades of progress in medicines that target tau and amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology. The clinical benefit of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against Aβ is limited, with current data showing only slight slowing of cognitive decline despite encouraging biomarker responses and recent regulatory approval of these drugs. Moreover, their wider clinical use is restricted by dose-dependent toxicities such as amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), and by the need for continuous long-term assessment of efficacy and safety in AD patients. The poor penetration of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) by large biologics is a significant but often overlooked factor contributing to this discrepancy. Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) has emerged as a non-invasive technique for transient localized modification of BBB permeability when paired with intravenously administered microbubbles. This evaluation examines LIFU as a means of delivering anti-tau and anti-amyloid antibodies to AD patients. By integrating data from early-phase clinical research with biological insights, we investigate whether altering the BBB can overcome the pharmacokinetic (PK) limitations of existing immunotherapies. LIFU has biological effects that are critical to the pathophysiology of AD in addition to aiding the mobility of macromolecules, such as enhanced lymphatic clearance and focused neuroimmune activation, which could help treatments based on antibodies. Clinical research to date shows that, in properly chosen AD cohorts, LIFU-mediated BBB opening is practical, reversible, and generally safe; however, there is still a lack of conclusive evidence connecting BBB modulation to elevated intraparenchymal antibody levels or long-term cognitive enhancement. We propose that LIFU should currently be regarded as a promising investigational adjunct to immunotherapy rather than an established therapeutic modality for AD. Biomarker-driven evidence of enhanced cerebral medication distribution and therapeutic effects determines its translational significance; BBB alteration could become a standard Alzheimer's therapeutic strategy if LIFU is successful.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The blood–brain barrier: Structure, regulation and drug delivery
Wu, D., Chen, Q., Chen, X., Han, F., Chen, Z., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01481-w · Cited by 1,906 · see citing works
Amyloid β-based therapy for Alzheimer’s disease: Challenges, successes and future
Zhang, Y., Chen, H., Li, R., Sterling, K., & Song, W. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01484-7 · Cited by 988 · see citing works
Interaction between Aβ and Tau in the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease
Zhang, H., Wei, W., Zhao, M., Ma, L., Jiang, X., Pei, H., Cao, Y., & Li, H. (2021) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.57078 · Cited by 689 · see citing works
Burgess, A., Dubey, S., Yeung, S., Hough, O., Eterman, N., Aubert, I., & Hynynen, K. (2014) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.14140245 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Alzheimer’s Disease: Key Insights from Two Decades of Clinical Trial Failures
Kim, C. K., Lee, Y. R., Ong, L., Gold, M., Kalali, A., & Sarkar, J. (2022) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-215699 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Nisbet, R. M., Van der Jeugd, A., Leinenga, G., Evans, H. T., Janowicz, P. W., & Götz, J. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx052 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
The barrier and interface mechanisms of the brain barrier, and brain drug delivery
Zhang, S., Gan, L., Cao, F., Wang, H., Gong, P., Ma, C., Ren, L., Lin, Y., & Lin, X. (2022) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2022.09.017 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Desale, S. H., Doshi, P. P., Khutale, A. A., & Suresh, S.
- Affiliations
- Dnyaan Prasad Global University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Suresh, Swathi
- ORCID
- Suresh, Swathi
- Venue
- Ageing Research Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026-11
- Volume
- 122
- Pages
- 103379
- ISSN
- 1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7213786265
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, low-intensity focused ultrasound, blood-brain barrier, blood-brain barrier opening, anti-amyloid antibodies, anti-tau antibodies, amyloid-beta, tau pathology, blood-brain barrier permeability, microbubbles, immunotherapy, pharmacokinetics, amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, neuroimmune activation, lymphatic clearance
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Blood-Brain Barrier, Humans, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Drug Delivery Systems, tau Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review