Cited by 12Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesFoot and Ankle SurgeryTendon Structure and Treatment

An In Vivo Prediction of Anisometry and Strain in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction – A Combined Magnetic Resonance and Dual Fluoroscopic Imaging Analysis

Open access
Kernkamp, Willem A., Varady, Nathan H., Li, Jing‐Sheng, Tsai, Tsung‐Yuan, Asnis, Peter D., van Arkel, Ewoud R.A., Nelissen, Rob G.H.H., Gill, Thomas J. +2 more·2018·Arthroscopy

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the in vivo anisometry and strain of theoretical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts in the healthy knee using various socket locations on both the femur and tibia. Methods: Eighteen healthy knees were imaged using magnetic resonance imaging and dual fluoroscopic imaging techniques during a step‐up and sit‐to‐stand motion. The anisometry of the medial aspect of the lateral femoral condyle was mapped using 144 theoretical socket positions connected to an anteromedial, central, and posterolateral attachment site on the tibia. The 3‐dimensional wrapping paths of each theoretical graft were measured. Comparisons were made between the anatomic, over the top (OTT), and most‐isometric (isometric) femoral socket locations, as well as between tibial insertions. Results: The area of least anisometry was found in the proximal‐distal direction just posterior to the intercondylar notch. The most isometric attachment site was found midway on the Blumensaat line with approximately 2% and 6% strain during the step‐up and sit‐to‐stand motion, respectively. Posterior femoral attachments resulted in decreased graft lengths with increasing flexion angles, whereas anterodistal attachments yielded increased lengths with increasing flexion angles. The anisometry of the anatomic, OTT and isometric grafts varied between tibial insertions ( P < .001). The anatomic graft was significantly more anisometric than the OTT and isometric graft at deeper flexion angles ( P < .001). Conclusions: An area of least anisometry was found in the proximal‐distal direction just posterior to the intercondylar notch. ACL reconstruction at the isometric and OTT location resulted in nonanatomic graft behavior, which could overconstrain the knee at deeper flexion angles. Tibial location significantly affected graft strains for the anatomic, OTT, and isometric socket location. Clinical Relevance: This study improves the knowledge on ACL anisometry and strain and helps surgeons to better understand the consequences of socket positioning during intra‐articular ACL reconstruction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.042

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kernkamp, W. A., Varady, N. H., Li, J., Tsai, T., Asnis, P. D., van Arkel, E. R. A., Nelissen, R. G. H. H., Gill, T. J., Van de Velde, S. K., & Li, G.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Focus Clinic Orthopedic Surgery Haaglanden Medical Center The Hague The Netherlands
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Boston Sports Medicine and Research Institute Dedham Massachusetts U.S.A.
Corresponding author
Li, Guoan
Venue
Arthroscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-04
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
1094-1103
ISSN
  • 0749-8063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-3231
OpenAlex
W2786281551
Cited by
12
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR055612)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Blumensaat line, knee flexion, intercondylar notch
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Epiphyses, Female, Femur, Fluoroscopy, Humans, Knee Joint, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Tibia, Range of Motion, Articular, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Young Adult, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Multimodal Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review