Cited by 53Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningTopic ModelingMachine Learning and Algorithms

A deep learning framework for hybrid heterogeneous transfer learning

Open access
Zhou, Joey Tianyi, Pan, Sinno Jialin, Tsang, Ivor W.·2019·Artificial Intelligence

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.artint.2019.06.001

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several machine learning specialisations, including reinforcement, hybrid, multi-view and self-supervised learning, are appearing in general healthcare but have not yet gained sufficient traction in multi-omics analysis.

    “Although various ML specialisations such as reinforcement (Coronato et al., 2020), hybrid (Zhou et al., 2019), multi-view (Zhao et al., 2017) and selfsupervised learning (Chen et al., 2019) are now emerging in generic health-care applications, they have not yet gained enough momentum in multi-omics analysis, hence they remain beyond the scope of this review.”

    From Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Zhou et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. M. Chen, Z.E. Xu, K.Q. Weinberger, F. Sha, Marginalized denoising autoencoders for domain adaptation, in: ICML, 2012.
  2. R. Socher, M. Ganjoo, C.D. Manning, A.Y. Ng, Zero-shot learning through cross-modal transfer, in: NIPS, 2013, pp. 935-943.
  3. S.J. Pan, I.W. Tsang, J.T. Kwok, Q. Yang, Domain adaptation via transfer component analysis, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 22 (2) (2011) 199-210.
  4. J. Yosinski, J. Clune, Y. Bengio, H. Lipson, How transferable are features in deep neural networks?, in: NIPS, 2014, pp. 3320-3328.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, J. T., Pan, S. J., & Tsang, I. W.
Affiliations
  • Institute of High Performance Computing (SG)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Pan, Sinno Jialin
Venue
Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
275
Pages
310-328
ISSN
0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950705418
Cited by
53
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nanyang Technological University
  • Australian Research Council
  • Ministry of Education - Singapore
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
heterogeneous transfer learning, feature projection, representation learning, multilingual text classification, cross-domain knowledge transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review