PreprintCited by 4,019Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognition

Open access
Donahue, Jeff, Jia, Yangqing, Vinyals, Oriol, Hoffman, Judy, Zhang, Ning, Tzeng, Eric, Darrell, Trevor·2013·arXiv

Abstract

We evaluate whether features extracted from the activation of a deep convolutional network trained in a fully supervised fashion on a large, fixed set of object recognition tasks can be re-purposed to novel generic tasks. Our generic tasks may differ significantly from the originally trained tasks and there may be insufficient labeled or unlabeled data to conventionally train or adapt a deep architecture to the new tasks. We investigate and visualize the semantic clustering of deep convolutional features with respect to a variety of such tasks, including scene recognition, domain adaptation, and fine-grained recognition challenges. We compare the efficacy of relying on various network levels to define a fixed feature, and report novel results that significantly outperform the state-of-the-art on several important vision challenges. We are releasing DeCAF, an open-source implementation of these deep convolutional activation features, along with all associated network parameters to enable vision researchers to be able to conduct experimentation with deep representations across a range of visual concept learning paradigms.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1310.1531

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep image representations learnt on ILSVRC generalise well to other datasets, where they have outperformed hand-crafted representations by a large margin.

    “as it turns out that deep image representations, learnt on ILSVRC, generalise well to other datasets, where they have outperformed hand-crafted representations by a large margin.”

    From Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition (2014) · cites this paper as Donahue et al., 2013

  • When applied to images of arbitrary sizes, current methods mostly fit the input image to a fixed size, either via cropping or via warping.

    “When applied to images of arbitrary sizes, current methods mostly fit the input image to the fixed size, either via cropping [3], [4] or via warping [13], [7], as shown in Figure 1 (top).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donahue, J., Jia, Y., Vinyals, O., Hoffman, J., Zhang, N., Tzeng, E., & Darrell, T.
Affiliations
International Computer Science Institute (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2013
Pages
647-655
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155541015
Cited by
4,019
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 195 · 2022: 238 · 2021: 386 · 2020: 477 · 2019: 553 · 2018: 520 · 2017: 536 · 2016: 445 · 2015: 361 · 2014: 142 · 2013: 8
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Conference on Machine Learning
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
transfer learning, scene classification, domain adaptation, fine-grained classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review