Cited by 220Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareImbalanced Data Classification TechniquesAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

A hybrid machine learning approach to cerebral stroke prediction based on imbalanced medical dataset

Liu, Tianyu, Fan, Wenhui, Wu, Cheng·2019·Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Abstract

Background and objective Cerebral stroke has become a significant global public health issue in recent years. The ideal solution to this concern is to prevent in advance by controlling related metabolic factors. However, it is difficult for medical staff to decide whether special precautions are needed for a potential patient only based on the monitoring of physiological indicators unless they are obviously abnormal. This paper will develop a hybrid machine learning approach to predict cerebral stroke for clinical diagnosis based on the physiological data with incompleteness and class imbalance.Methods Two steps are involved in the whole process. Firstly, random forest regression is adopted to impute missing values before classification. Secondly, an automated hyperparameter optimization(AutoHPO) based on deep neural network(DNN) is applied to stroke prediction on an imbalanced dataset.Results The medical dataset contains 43,400 records of potential patients which includes 783 occurrences of stroke. The false negative rate from our prediction approach is only 19.1%, which has reduced by an average of 51.5% in comparison to other traditional approaches. The false positive rate, accuracy and sensitivity predicted by the proposed approach are respectively 33.1, 71.6, and 67.4%.Conclusion The approach proposed in this paper has effectively reduced the false negative rate with a relatively high overall accuracy, which means a successful decrease in the misdiagnosis rate for stroke prediction. The results are more reliable and valid as the reference in stroke prognosis, and also can be acquired conveniently at a low cost.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101723

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, T., Fan, W., & Wu, C.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Fan, Wenhui
Venue
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
101
Pages
101723
ISSN
0933-3657 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981817161
Cited by
220
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 9
FWCI
18.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
class imbalance, missing data imputation, random forest regression, automated hyperparameter optimization, deep neural network, physiological parameters, false negative reduction, stroke prognosis
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Humans, Prognosis, Neural Networks, Computer, Stroke, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review