Cited by 40Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationInnovations in Medical EducationProblem and Project Based Learning

A smarter perspective: Learning with and from AI-cases

Open access
Arbelaez Ossa, Laura, Rost, Michael, Lorenzini, Giorgia, Shaw, David M., Elger, Bernice Simone·2023·Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has only partially (or not at all) been integrated into medical education, leading to growing concerns regarding how to train healthcare practitioners to handle the changes brought about by the introduction of AI. Programming lessons and other technical information into healthcare curricula has been proposed as a solution to support healthcare personnel in using AI or other future technology. However, integrating these core elements of computer science knowledge might not meet the observed need that students will benefit from gaining practical experience with AI in the direct application area. Therefore, this paper proposes a dynamic approach to case-based learning that utilizes the scenarios where AI is currently used in clinical practice as examples. This approach will support students' understanding of technical aspects. Case-based learning with AI as an example provides additional benefits: (1) it allows doctors to compare their thought processes to the AI suggestions and critically reflect on the assumptions and biases of AI and clinical practice; (2) it incentivizes doctors to discuss and address ethical issues inherent to technology and those already existing in current clinical practice; (3) it serves as a foundation for fostering interdisciplinary collaboration via discussion of different views between technologists, multidisciplinary experts, and healthcare professionals. The proposed knowledge shift from AI as a technical focus to AI as an example for case-based learning aims to encourage a different perspective on educational needs. Technical education does not need to compete with other essential clinical skills as it could serve as a basis for supporting them, which leads to better medical education and practice, ultimately benefiting patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102458

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In one study, students were provided with AI-generated scenarios, and educators compared students' thought processes with AI-generated suggestions; the approach facilitated critical reflections.

    “In one, students were provided with AI-generated scenarios, and educators compared students’ thought processes with AI-generated suggestions [150]. The approach facilitated critical reflections.”

    From Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [150]

    The Introduction describes a proposed, theoretically informed approach using existing clinical AI scenarios as examples for students, not a study in which students were given AI-generated scenarios. The Abstract and §4.1 say doctors could compare their thinking with AI suggestions and critically reflect; they do not report educators making that comparison or an observed improvement in reflection. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Three additional studies explored the integration of AI in case-based learning.

    “Three additional studies explored the integration of AI in case-based learning [150–152].”
  • Uncertainty about AI's real-world applicability in medicine was described as a challenge.

    “uncertainty about AI’s real-world applicability in medicine [150]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines 2013., Transforming and scaling up health professionals' education and training. ISBN: 978 92 4 150650 2 Res Med 2014;22(143):42-5. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/transforming-and -scaling-up-health-professionals%E2%80%99-education-and-training. [Accessed 25 November 2022].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arbelaez Ossa, L., Rost, M., Lorenzini, G., Shaw, D. M., & Elger, B. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Venue
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
135
Pages
102458
ISSN
0933-3657 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309729793
Cited by
39
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (187263, 407740_187263 /1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
Keywords
artificial intelligence in medical education, case-based learning, clinical reasoning, interdisciplinary collaboration, clinical skills
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Education, Medical, Health Personnel, Humans, Learning, Physicians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review