Cited by 48Fuzzy Logic and Control SystemsAdvanced Algebra and LogicAdvanced Control Systems Design

Derivation and stability analysis of the analytical structures of the interval type-2 fuzzy PID controller

El-Nagar, Ahmad M., El-Bardini, Mohammad·2014·Applied Soft Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.040

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El-Nagar, A. M., & El-Bardini, M.
Affiliations
Menoufia University (EG)
Corresponding author
El-Nagar, Ahmad M.
Venue
Applied Soft Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
24
Pages
704-716
ISSN
1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981328874
Cited by
48
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Soft Computing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Algebra and Logic
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
Keywords
interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller, type reduction, BIBO stability, small gain theorem, nonlinear PID control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review