Cited by 23Fuzzy Logic and Control SystemsAdaptive Dynamic Programming ControlAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems

Online learning of an interval type-2 TSK fuzzy logic controller for nonlinear systems

Khater, A. Aziz, El-Nagar, Ahmad M., El-Bardini, Mohammad, El-Rabaie, Nabila M.·2019·Journal of the Franklin Institute

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.08.031

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khater, A. A., El-Nagar, A. M., El-Bardini, M., & El-Rabaie, N. M.
Affiliations
Menoufia University (EG)
Corresponding author
El-Nagar, Ahmad M.
Venue
Journal of the Franklin Institute
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
356
Issue
16
Pages
9254-9285
ISSN
0016-0032 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2975286643
Cited by
23
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Franklin Institute (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Keywords
interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller, Takagi-Sugeno-Kang fuzzy systems, reinforcement learning, online learning, nonlinear systems, guaranteed cost control, Lyapunov stability, critic neural network, learning rate selection, robust control, uncertain systems, external disturbances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review