Cited by 316COVID-19 diagnosis using AIRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

A Novel Medical Diagnosis model for COVID-19 infection detection based on Deep Features and Bayesian Optimization

Open access
Nour, Majid, Cömert, Zafer, Polat, Kemal·2020·Applied Soft Computing

Abstract

A pneumonia of unknown causes, which was detected in Wuhan, China, and spread rapidly throughout the world, was declared as Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Thousands of people have lost their lives to this disease. Its negative effects on public health are ongoing. In this study, an intelligence computer-aided model that can automatically detect positive COVID-19 cases is proposed to support daily clinical applications. The proposed model is based on the convolution neural network (CNN) architecture and can automatically reveal discriminative features on chest X-ray images through its convolution with rich filter families, abstraction, and weight-sharing characteristics. Contrary to the generally used transfer learning approach, the proposed deep CNN model was trained from scratch. Instead of the pre-trained CNNs, a novel serial network consisting of five convolution layers was designed. This CNN model was utilized as a deep feature extractor. The extracted deep discriminative features were used to feed the machine learning algorithms, which were k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine (SVM), and decision tree. The hyperparameters of the machine learning models were optimized using the Bayesian optimization algorithm. The experiments were conducted on a public COVID-19 radiology database. The database was divided into two parts as training and test sets with 70% and 30% rates, respectively. As a result, the most efficient results were ensured by the SVM classifier with an accuracy of 98.97%, a sensitivity of 89.39%, a specificity of 99.75%, and an F-score of 96.72%. Consequently, a cheap, fast, and reliable intelligence tool has been provided for COVID-19 infection detection. The developed model can be used to assist field specialists, physicians, and radiologists in the decision-making process. Thanks to the proposed tool, the misdiagnosis rates can be reduced, and the proposed model can be used as a retrospective evaluation tool to validate positive COVID-19 infection cases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106580

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CNN has become the primary tool for automatic COVID-19 diagnosis in many hospitals around the world using chest X-ray images.

    “CNN has become the primary tool for automatic COVID-19 diagnosis in many hospitals around the world using chest X-ray images [256–260].”

    From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [259]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says many CNN-based models using chest X-rays have been proposed for COVID-19 evaluation. The Abstract and Conclusion describe this paper’s model as a proposed aid to clinical practice, tested on a public radiology database. They do not establish that CNNs had become the primary diagnostic tool in hospitals worldwide. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]Muhammad E.H.C. Tawsifur R. Amith K. Rashid M. Muhammad Abdul K. Zaid Bin M. COVID-19 radiology database. Can AI help screen viral COVID-19 pneumonia? 2020 1 14 https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.13145 · arXiv
  2. [36]Rokach L. Maimon O. Decision Trees Data Min. Knowl. Discov. Handb. 2005 Springer US Boston, MA 165 192 10.1007/0-387-25465-X · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nour, M., Cömert, Z., & Polat, K.
Affiliations
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
  • Samsun University (TR)
  • Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University (TR)
Corresponding author
Polat, Kemal
Venue
Applied Soft Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
97
Pages
106580
ISSN
1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044240928
Cited by
316
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 21
FWCI
32.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Soft Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
King Abdulaziz University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
COVID-19 detection, chest X-ray images, computer-aided diagnosis, convolutional neural networks, deep feature extraction, Bayesian optimization, hyperparameter optimization, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, decision tree, COVID-19 pneumonia, radiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review