Cited by 415Healthcare Systems and ChallengesDisaster Response and ManagementInfection Control and Ventilation

Protecting Healthcare Workers During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak: Lessons From Taiwan’s Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Response

Open access
Schwartz, Jonathan, King, Chwan-Chuen, Yen, Muh-Yong·2020·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

During major epidemic outbreaks, demand for healthcare workers (HCWs) grows even as the extreme pressures they face cause declining availability. We draw on Taiwan’s severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) experience to argue that a modified form of traffic control bundling (TCB) protects HCW safety and by extension strengthens overall coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciaa255

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During previous epidemics such as SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and Ebola, mental health and stress effects were substantial among health workers.

    “As has been proven in previous epidemics such as SARS-CoV, in 2002, MERS-CoV, in 2012, or Ebola, between 2014 and 2016, the effects on mental health and stress have been important among this group (Schwartz et al., 2020, Wu et al., 2009)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Yen MY, Schwartz J, Wu JSJ, Hsueh PR. Controlling MERS: lesson learned from SARS. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61:1761-2.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwartz, J., King, C.-C., & Yen, M.-Y.
Affiliations
  • SUNY New Paltz (US)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Taipei Municipal YangMing Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Yen, Muh-Yong
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2020-03-12
Volume
71
Issue
15
Pages
858-860
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W3010753571
Cited by
415
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 152 · 2019: 1
FWCI
101.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Taiwan Centers for Disease Control (DOH 92-DC-SA01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
Keywords
healthcare worker safety, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS, epidemic control
MeSH terms
Personal Protective Equipment, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Disease Outbreaks, Health Personnel, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Taiwan, Coronavirus Infections, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review