Cited by 1,170Infrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

Autonomous concrete crack detection using deep fully convolutional neural network

Dung, Cao Vu, Anh, Le Duc·2019·Automation in Construction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.028

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dung, C. V., & Anh, L. D.
Affiliations
Tokyo City University (JP)
Corresponding author
Dung, Cao Vu
Venue
Automation in Construction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
99
Pages
52-58
ISSN
0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905163589
Cited by
1,170
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 100 · 2025: 155 · 2024: 192 · 2023: 204 · 2022: 207 · 2021: 158 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 33
FWCI
70.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Automation in Construction (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tokyo City University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Keywords
concrete crack detection, semantic segmentation, fully convolutional network, encoder-decoder architecture, cyclic loading test, structural health monitoring, video image analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review