Cited by 671Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning

Towards blockchain-based intelligent transportation systems

Yuan, Yong, Wang, Fei-Yue·2016·2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)

Abstract

Blockchain, widely known as one of the disruptive technologies emerged in recent years, is experiencing rapid development and has the full potential of revolutionizing the increasingly centralized intelligent transportation systems (ITS) in applications. Blockchain can be utilized to establish a secured, trusted and decentralized autonomous ITS ecosystem, creating better usage of the legacy ITS infrastructure and resources, especially effective for crowdsourcing technology. This paper conducts a preliminary study of Blockchain-based ITS (B2ITS). We outline an ITS-oriented, seven-layer conceptual model for blockchain, and on this basis address the key research issues in B2ITS. We consider that blockchain is one of the secured and trusted architectures for building the newly developed parallel transportation management systems (PtMS) , and thereby discuss the relationship between B2ITS and PtMS. Finally, we present a case study for blockchain-based realtime ride-sharing services. In our viewpoint, B2ITS represents the future trend of ITS research and practice, and this paper is aimed at stimulating further effort and providing helpful guidance and reference for future research works.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/itsc.2016.7795984

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some documents in macro-clusters C1 and C2 propose new platforms just at a concept level.

    “Some of them propose new platforms just at a concept level [45,51,52,75,77,83,84,88,89,91], some of them present proofs of their concepts [76,79,81], and only three of them present a real implementation based on real blockchains: [78,80,82].”

    From A Review of Blockchain-Based Systems in Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [52]

  • There is a lack of trust among the ITS actors.

    “Lack of trust among the ITS actors”

    From A Review of Blockchain-Based Systems in Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [52]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuan, Y., & Wang, F.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • National University of Defense Technology (CN)
Venue
2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-11
Pages
2663-2668
OpenAlex
W2566758857
Cited by
671
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 1
FWCI
53.25
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
blockchain, intelligent transportation systems, autonomous decentralized systems, crowdsourcing, ride-sharing, trust and security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review