Cited by 71Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiovascular and exercise physiologyHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Exercise in the postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome

Open access
Fu, Qi, Levine, Benjamin D.·2015·Autonomic Neuroscience

Abstract

Patients with the Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) have orthostatic intolerance, as well as exercise intolerance. Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) is generally lower in these patients compared with healthy sedentary individuals, suggesting a lower physical fitness level. During acute exercise, POTS patients have an excessive increase in heart rate and reduced stroke volume for each level of absolute workload; however, when expressed at relative workload (%VO2peak), there is no difference in the heart rate response between patients and healthy individuals. The relationship between cardiac output and VO2 is similar between POTS patients and healthy individuals. Short-term (i.e., 3 months) exercise training increases cardiac size and mass, blood volume, and VO2peak in POTS patients. Exercise performance is improved after training. Specifically, stroke volume is greater and heart rate is lower at any given VO2 during exercise after training versus before training. Peak heart rate is the same but peak stroke volume and cardiac output are greater after training. Heart rate recovery from peak exercise is significantly faster after training, indicating an improvement in autonomic circulatory control. These results suggest that patients with POTS have no intrinsic abnormality of heart rate regulation during exercise. The tachycardia in POTS is due to a reduced stroke volume. Cardiac remodeling and blood volume expansion associated with exercise training increase physical f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.autneu.2014.11.008

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fu, Q., & Levine, B. D.
Affiliations
Texas Health Dallas (US)
Corresponding author
Fu, Qi
Venue
Autonomic Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
188
Pages
86-89
ISSN
1566-0702 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090154799
Cited by
71
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autonomic Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (HL075238 grant)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, exercise training, peak oxygen uptake, stroke volume, heart rate response, cardiac output, cardiac remodeling, blood volume expansion, heart rate recovery, exercise intolerance, orthostatic intolerance
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Exercise, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review