The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust model predictive control of constrained linear systems with bounded disturbances
Abstract
This paper provides a novel solution to the problem of robust model predictive control of constrained, linear, discrete-time systems in the presence of bounded disturbances. The optimal control problem that is solved online includes, uniquely, the initial state of the model employed in the problem as a decision variable. The associated value function is zero in a disturbance invariant set that serves as the 'origin' when bounded disturbances are present, and permits a strong stability result, namely robust exponential stability of the disturbance invariant set for the controlled system with bounded disturbances, to be obtained. The resultant online algorithm is a quadratic program of similar complexity to that required in conventional model predictive control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality
Mayne, D. Q., Rawlings, J. B., Rao, C. V., & Scokaert, P. O. M. (2000) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(99)00214-9 · Cited by 8,736
Self-citation
Cited by
Architectures for distributed and hierarchical Model Predictive Control – A review
Scattolini, R. (2009) · Journal of Process Control · doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2009.02.003 · Cited by 1,293
(2013) · Dynamic Modelling and Predictive Control in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: First Principle and Data‐Based Approaches · doi:10.1002/9781118501054.ch6 · Cited by 1,047
Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learning
Brunke, L., Greeff, M., Hall, A. W., Yuan, Z., Zhou, S., Panerati, J., & Schoellig, A. P. (2022) · Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1146/annurev-control-042920-020211 · Cited by 769
Optimization over state feedback policies for robust control with constraints
Goulart, P. J., Kerrigan, E. C., & Maciejowski, J. M. (2006) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2005.08.023 · Cited by 580
Tube‐based robust nonlinear model predictive control
Mayne, D. Q., Kerrigan, E. C., van Wyk, E. J., & Falugi, P. (2011) · International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · doi:10.1002/rnc.1758 · Cited by 462
Self-citationLearning deep control policies for autonomous aerial vehicles with MPC-guided policy search
Zhang, T., Kahn, G., Levine, S., & Abbeel, P. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2016.7487175 · Cited by 452
“Model predictive control (MPC) is an effective and reliable method for controlling robotic systems, particularly autonomous aerial vehicles such as quadcopters, because of its robustness to moderate model errors [26], ability to use high-level objectives [41], and relative simplicity.”
MethodFarina, M., & Scattolini, R. (2012) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2012.03.020 · Cited by 278
Model Predictive Control approach for guidance of spacecraft rendezvous and proximity maneuvering
Di Cairano, S., Park, H., & Kolmanovsky, I. (2012) · International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · doi:10.1002/rnc.2827 · Cited by 273
Disturbance Compensating Model Predictive Control With Application to Ship Heading Control
Li, Z., & Sun, J. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · doi:10.1109/tcst.2011.2106212 · Cited by 168
A Distributionally Robust Optimization Based Method for Stochastic Model Predictive Control
Li, B., Tan, Y., Wu, A.-G., & Duan, G.-R. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2021.3124750 · Cited by 156
Contraction theory for nonlinear stability analysis and learning-based control: A tutorial overview
Tsukamoto, H., Chung, S.-J., & Slotine, J.-J. E. (2021) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.10.001 · Cited by 145
Event-Triggered Robust Distributed MPC for Multi-Agent Systems with A Two-Step Event Verification
Deng, L., Shu, Z., & Chen, T. (2022) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.11.322 · Cited by 2
A Robust Model Predictive Control Method for Networked Control Systems
Beger, S., & Hirche, S. (2024) · 2024 IEEE 63rd Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc56724.2024.10886340 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayne, D. Q., Seron, M. M., & Raković, S. V.
- Venue
- Automatica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-224
- ISSN
- 0005-1098 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981723834
- Cited by
- 1,672
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.