The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus of multi-agent systems via fully distributed event-triggered control
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This article studies consensus of linear multi-agent systems (MASs) on undirected graphs. An adaptive event-triggering protocol is constructed for consensus control by using relative information between agents. Sufficient conditions are established for consensus of linear MASs without and with external disturbances, respectively. Zeno behavior is proved to be excluded. Moreover, a self-triggered realization based on sampled information is formulated for the protocol. Since the proposed protocol incorporates both adaptive control and event-triggered control, it can be implemented in a fully distributed way and only makes use of the sampled relative information between neighboring agents. Two numerical examples are finally provided for demonstrating the effectiveness and advantages of the theoretical results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slotine, J.-J. E., & Li, W. (1991) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 18,975
Distributed event-triggered control for multi-agent systems
Dimarogonas, D. V., Frazzoli, E., & Johansson, K. H. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2011.2174666 · Cited by 2,556
Consensus of Multiagent Systems and Synchronization of Complex Networks: A Unified Viewpoint
Li, Z., Duan, Z., Chen, G., & Huang, L. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2009.2023937 · Cited by 2,400
An introduction to event-triggered and self-triggered control
Heemels, W. P. M. H., Johansson, K. H., & Tabuada, P. (2012) · 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc.2012.6425820 · Cited by 1,940
A property of eigenvectors of nonnegative symmetric matrices and its application to graph theory
Fiedler, M. (1975) · Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal · doi:10.21136/cmj.1975.101357 · Cited by 1,042
A survey of distributed optimization
Yang, T., Yi, X., Wu, J., Yuan, Y., Wu, D., Meng, Z., Hong, Y., Wang, H., Lin, Z., & Johansson, K. H. (2019) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.05.006 · Cited by 913
Distributed event-triggered control of multi-agent systems with combinational measurements
Fan, Y., Feng, G., Wang, Y., & Song, C. (2013) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2012.11.010 · Cited by 799
Consensus of Linear Multi-Agent Systems by Distributed Event-Triggered Strategy
Hu, W., Liu, L., & Feng, G. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2015.2398892 · Cited by 738
Distributed consensus of linear multi-agent systems with adaptive dynamic protocols
Li, Z., Ren, W., Liu, X., & Xie, L. (2013) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2013.03.015 · Cited by 672
Event-Triggering Sampling Based Leader-Following Consensus in Second-Order Multi-Agent Systems
Li, H., Liao, X., Huang, T., & Zhu, W. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2014.2365073 · Cited by 624
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, X., Tang, Y., & Karimi, H. R.
- Venue
- Automatica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 116
- Pages
- 108898
- ISSN
- 0005-1098 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3011108628
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 23.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus of multi-agent systems via fully distributed event-triggered control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.automatica.2020.108898
- The paper
- Li, X., Tang, Y., & Karimi, H. R. (2020). Consensus of multi-agent systems via fully distributed event-triggered control. Automatica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2020.108898
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
