The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Event-Triggering Sampling Based Leader-Following Consensus in Second-Order Multi-Agent Systems
Abstract
In this note, the problem of second-order leader-following consensus by a novel distributed event-triggered sampling scheme in which agents exchange information via a limited communication medium is studied. Event-based distributed sampling rules are designed, where each agent decides when to measure its own state value and requests its neighbor agents broadcast their state values across the network when a locally-computed measurement error exceeds a state-dependent threshold. For the case of fixed topology, a necessary and sufficient condition is established. For the case of switching topology, a sufficient condition is obtained under the assumption that the time-varying directed graph is uniformly jointly connected. It is shown that the inter-event intervals are lower bounded by a strictly positive constant, which excludes the Zeno-behavior before the consensus is achieved. Numerical simulation examples are provided to demonstrate the correctness of theoretical results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distributed event-triggered control for multi-agent systems
Dimarogonas, D. V., Frazzoli, E., & Johansson, K. H. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2011.2174666 · Cited by 2,556
Cited by
Event-triggered communication and control of networked systems for multi-agent consensus
Nowzari, C., Garcia, E., & Cortés, J. (2019) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2019.03.009 · Cited by 655
Hu, W., Yang, C., Huang, T., & Gui, W. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2018.2868778 · Cited by 391
Self-citationConsensus of multi-agent systems via fully distributed event-triggered control
Li, X., Tang, Y., & Karimi, H. R. (2020) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2020.108898 · Cited by 391
Hu, W., Liu, L., & Feng, G. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2016.2602327 · Cited by 320
Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Yu, Y., & Sun, C. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2018.2876334 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, H., Liao, X., Huang, T., & Zhu, W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1998-2003
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2523
- OpenAlex
- W1994186360
- Cited by
- 624
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 50.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Event-Triggering Sampling Based Leader-Following Consensus in Second-Order Multi-Agent Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2014.2365073
- The paper
- Li, H., Liao, X., Huang, T., & Zhu, W. (2015). Event-Triggering Sampling Based Leader-Following Consensus in Second-Order Multi-Agent Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2014.2365073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.