The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artificial time constraints on the Iowa Gambling Task: The effects on behavioural performance and subjective experience
Abstract
In the last decade, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) has become a widely employed neuropsychological research instrument for the investigation of executive function. The task has been employed in a wide range of formats, from 'manual' procedures to more recently introduced computerised versions. Computer-based formats often require that responses on the task should be artificially delayed by a number of seconds between trials to collect skin-conductance data. Participants, however, may become frustrated when they want to select from a particular deck in the time-limited versions--so that an unintended emotional experience of frustration might well disrupt a task presumed to be reliant on emotion-based learning. We investigated the effect of the various types of Iowa Gambling Task format on performance, using three types of task: the classic manual administration, with no time limitations; a computerised administration with a 6-s enforced delay; and a control computerised version which had no time constraints. We also evaluated the subjective experience of participants on each task. There were no significant differences in performance, between formats, in behavioural terms. Subjective experience measures on the task also showed consistent effects across all three formats-with substantial, and rapidly developing, awareness of which decks were 'good' and 'bad.'
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, these data challenge previous research that suggests non-conscious intuitive signals dominate decisional choices in the early stages of the IGT (e.g., Bowman et al., 2005; Maia and McClelland, 2005; Fernie and Tunney, 2006, 2013).”
From Performance Under Stress: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) (2018) · cites this paper as Bowman et al., 2005
Citations
Cites
The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex
Damasio, A. R. (1996) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0125 · Cited by 2,847 · cited 1×
“, a powerful emotion that was not intended to be part of test administration, might well disrupt a task presumed to be reliant on emotion-based learning (Bechara, 2003; Damasio, 1996).”
BackgroundDifferent contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-13-05473.1999 · Cited by 2,001
Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: Patient EVR
Eslinger, P. J., & Damasio, A. R. (1985) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.35.12.1731 · Cited by 1,426 · cited 1×
“…of the fact that it assesses an aspect of executive function that previously had been difficult to investigate (Anderson, Damasio, Damasio, & Tranel, 1988; Brickner, 1934; Damasio, Tranel, & Damasio, 1990; Eslinger & Damasio, 1985), but which is of considerable scientific interest (Bechara, 2003).”
BackgroundDAMASIO, A. (1990) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(90)90144-4 · Cited by 1,275
Cavedini, P., Riboldi, G., D'Annucci, A., Belotti, P., Cisima, M., & Bellodi, L. (2002) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00077-x · Cited by 277
Basal-corticofrontal circuits in schizophrenia and obsessive-compulsive disorder
Cavallaro, R., Cavedini, P., Mistretta, P., Bassi, T., Angelone, S. M., Ubbiali, A., & Bellodi, L. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01814-0 · Cited by 140
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Anderson, 1999, Impairment of social and moral behaviour related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex, Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1032, 10.1038/14833 · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson, 1996, Characterization of the decision-making defect of subjects with ventromedial frontal lobe damage, Society for Neuroscience, 22, 1108
- Anderson, 1988, Neuropsychological correlates of bilateral frontal lobe lesions in humans, Society for Neuroscience, 14, 1288
- Bechara, 2003, Risky business: Emotion, decision-making, and addiction, Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 23, 10.1023/A:1021223113233 · DOI
- Bechara, 1994, Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex, Cognition, 50, 7, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Bechara, 1998, Dissociation of working memory from decision-making within the human prefrontal cortex, Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 428, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-01-00428.1998 · DOI
- Bechara, 1997, Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy, Science, 275, 1293, 10.1126/science.275.5304.1293 · DOI · Paper page
- Bechara, 2002, Decision-making and addiction (part II): Myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward?, Neuropsychologia, 40, 1690, 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00016-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Bechara, 1996, Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex, Cerebral Cortex, 6, 215, 10.1093/cercor/6.2.215 · DOI · Paper page
- Beninger, 2003, Typical and atypical antipsychotic medications differentially affect two nondeclarative memory tasks in schizophrenic patients: A double dissociation, Schizophrenia Research, 61, 281, 10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00315-8 · DOI
- Blair, 2001, Somatic markers and response reversal: Is there orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in boys with psychopathic tendencies?, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 499, 10.1023/A:1012277125119 · DOI
- Bolla, 2003, Orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in abstinent cocaine abusers performing a decision-making task, NeuroImage, 19, 1085, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00113-7 · DOI
- Bowman, C. H., & Turnbull, O. H. (in press). Emotion-based learning on a simplified card task: The Iowa and Bangor Gambling Tasks. Brain and Cognition
- Bowman, 2003, Real versus facsimile reinforcers on the Iowa Gambling Task, Brain and Cognition, 53, 207, 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00111-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Crone, 2003, Decision-making in disinhibited adolescents and adults: Insensitivity to future consequences or driven by immediate reward?, Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1
- Evans, C. E. Y., Bowman, C. H., & Turnbull, O. H. (under review). Subjective experience and the Iowa Gambling Task: Preserved performance in schizophrenia
- Evans, C. E. Y., Kemish, K., & Turnbull, O. H. (in press). Paradoxical effects of education on the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition
- North, 2001, Decision making in patients with spinal cord damage: Afferent feedback and the somatic marker hypothesis, Neuropsychologia, 39, 521, 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00107-X · DOI
- Schmitt, 1999, Testing Damasio’s somatic marker hypothesis with psychopathic individuals: Risk takers or risk averse?, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 3, 538, 10.1037/0021-843X.108.3.538 · DOI
- Suzuki, A., Hirota, A., Takasawa, N., & Shigemasu, K. (in press). Application of the somatic marker hypothesis to individual differences in decision making. Biological Psychiatry
- Tomb, 2002, Do somatic markers mediate decisions on the gambling task?, Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1103, 10.1038/nn1102-1103 · DOI
- Turnbull, O. H., Evans, C. E. Y., Bunce, A., Carzolio, B., & O’Connor, J. (in press). Central executive resources and the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition
- Wilder, 1998, Operant conditioning and the orbitofrontal cortex in schizophrenic patients: Unexpected evidence for intact functioning, Schizophrenia Research, 30, 169, 10.1016/S0920-9964(97)00135-7 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation
Dunn, B. D., Dalgleish, T., & Lawrence, A. D. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.001 · Cited by 894
The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.002 · Cited by 798
Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review
Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12003214 · Cited by 652
Construct validity of the iowa gambling task
Buelow, M. T., & Suhr, J. A. (2009) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-009-9083-4 · Cited by 464
Performance Under Stress: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)
Simonovic, B., Stupple, E. J. N., Gale, M., & Sheffield, D. (2018) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00217 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowman, C. H., Evans, C. E. Y., & Turnbull, O. H.
- Venue
- Brain and Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-25
- ISSN
- 0278-2626
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
