Cited by 798Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers

Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Damasio, A.R.·2005·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

A recent study by Maia and McClelland on participants' knowledge in the Iowa Gambling Task suggests a different interpretation for an experiment we reported in 1997. The authors use their results to question the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis. Here we consider whether the authors' conclusions are justified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.002

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The VMPFC has long been implicated in reward-related decision-making.

    “The VMPFC has long been implicated in reward-related decision-making (Bechara et al., 1997, 2005; Glascher et al., 2012)”

    From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Bechara et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Bechara, A.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-04
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
159-162
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965035892
Cited by
798
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 35
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
Iowa Gambling Task, somatic marker hypothesis, emotional knowledge, decision-making, emotional valence, risk-taking, emotional decision-making
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Awareness, Consciousness, Decision Making, Emotions, Galvanic Skin Response, Gambling, Games, Experimental, Humans, Models, Psychological, Psychological Theory, Risk-Taking, Biomarkers, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review