Cited by 72Tryptophan and brain disordersStress Responses and CortisolHealth disparities and outcomes

Association between social isolation and inflammatory markers in depressed and non-depressed individuals: Results from the MONICA/KORA study

Häfner, S., Emeny, R.T., Lacruz, M.E., Baumert, J., Herder, C., Koenig, W., Thorand, B., Ladwig, K.H.·2011·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

Introduction Depressed individuals not only suffer from chronic low grade inflammation, but also exhibit an inflammatory hyper-responsiveness to acute stress. We investigate whether chronic stress also induces an exaggerated inflammatory response in individuals with increased depression features. As model for chronic stress, social isolation was chosen. Methods Interleukin (IL)-6 and hs-CRP levels were assessed in 1547 subjects (847 men and 700 women), derived from the population-based MONICA/KORA study. Standardized questionnaires were used to assess depressed mood (depression and exhaustion subscale) and social isolation (social network index). The relationship between the two inflammatory markers, social isolation and depressed mood was examined taking into account interactions social isolation × depressed mood using multivariable linear regression models, adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol, and physical activity. Analyses were performed in men and women separately. Results We observed a significant interaction between depressed mood and social isolation regarding IL-6 and hs-CRP, respectively in men (p-value=0.02 for IL-6 and Conclusion The interaction of depressed mood and social isolation elicits a substantial synergistic impact on inflammatory markers in men, but not in depressed women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.06.017

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Häfner, S., Emeny, R. T., Lacruz, M. E., Baumert, J., Herder, C., Koenig, W., Thorand, B., & Ladwig, K. H.
Affiliations
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. (DE)
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
Corresponding author
Ladwig, K.H.
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
1701-1707
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062478357
Cited by
72
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Bundesministerium für Gesundheit
  • Helmholtz Zentrum München
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
social isolation, depression, chronic stress, inflammation, interleukin-6, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, depressive mood, sex differences, social networks
MeSH terms
Affect, Aged, C-Reactive Protein, Chronic Disease, Depression, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Middle Aged, Population, Sex Characteristics, Social Environment, Social Isolation, Stress, Psychological, Biomarkers, Interleukin-6, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review