Cited by 40Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Behavioral effects of PNU-282987, an alpha7 nicotinic receptor agonist, in mice

Vicens, Paloma, Ribes, Diana, Torrente, Margarita, Domingo, José L.·2011·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

The cholinergic system is closely related to learning and memory processes, and its neurodegeneration seems to be involved in neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric cognitive disorders in the elderly. Alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) have recently been shown to mediate neuroprotection and enhance cognitive performance in a variety of tasks, suggesting that there may be a new target for the pharmacotherapy of cognitive deficiencies. In this study, we investigated the behavioral effects of the acute and sub-chronic administration of 0, 1, 3, and 5 mg/kg of PNU-282987 (PNU) on motor activity, anxiety and learning in open-field and Morris water maze tasks in mice. Our results showed that the highest dose of PNU (5 mg/kg) diminished motor activity in the open-field following 5 and 12 days of administration (acute and sub-chronic, respectively). No effects on the acquisition of the Morris water maze were observed. However, only 1 mg/kg of PNU administered just before training trials over a period of 5 days showed beneficial effects on the retention of the water maze when evaluated 4 h after water maze acquisition. Further studies are needed to clarify the effects on the cognitive performance and potential neuroprotection of these agents in an elderly population with slight or severe deficiency in learning and memory processes, and/or in animal models vulnerable to neurodegenerative disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.08.015

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vicens, P., Ribes, D., Torrente, M., & Domingo, J. L.
Affiliations
Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (ES)
Corresponding author
Vicens, Paloma
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
216
Issue
1
Pages
341-348
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013722058
Cited by
39
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
PNU-282987, α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist, cognitive enhancement, learning and memory, Morris water maze, motor activity, anxiety, neuroprotection, cholinergic system, neurodegenerative diseases, cognitive impairment in older adults
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Anxiety, Benzamides, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Cognition, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Motor Activity, Random Allocation, Receptors, Nicotinic, Retention, Psychology, Spatial Behavior, Nicotinic Agonists, Maze Learning, Mice, alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review