Cited by 233Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudySchizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Impaired attention is central to the cognitive deficits observed in alpha 7 deficient mice

Young, Jared W., Crawford, Nicola, Kelly, John S., Kerr, Lorraine E., Marston, Hugh M., Spratt, Christopher, Finlayson, Keith, Sharkey, John·2007·European Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

alpha7-Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (alpha7-nAChR) have been implicated in a range of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Therefore we examined alpha7-nAChR knockout (KO), heterozygote (HT) and wildtype (WT) littermate mice in the 5-CSR (a rodent model of sustained attention) and odour span (a novel mouse working memory paradigm) tasks, and related performance to nAChR density. Whilst there was no difference between groups in baseline 5-CSR task performance, alpha7-nAChR KO's exhibited significantly higher omission levels compared to WT mice on increasing the attentional load, with HT mice performing at an intermediate level. Furthermore, alpha7-nAChR KO mice were significantly impaired in the odour span task when compared to WT mice, in a pattern consistent with impaired attention. These behavioural deficits were associated with the loss of alpha7-nAChRs, as alpha4beta2-nAChR density was unaltered in these mice. Thus these studies intimate that the attentional impairment in alpha7-nAChR transgenic mice maybe core to other deficits in cognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2006.03.008

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, J. W., Crawford, N., Kelly, J. S., Kerr, L. E., Marston, H. M., Spratt, C., Finlayson, K., & Sharkey, J.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Finlayson, Keith
Venue
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
145-155
ISSN
0924-977X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074915076
Cited by
233
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 20
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, knockout mice, sustained attention, working memory, attentional load, omission errors, α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, receptor density
MeSH terms
Quinolizidine Alkaloids, Aconitine, Alkaloids, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Azocines, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Cognition Disorders, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Protein Binding, Quinolizines, Reaction Time, Receptors, Nicotinic, Tritium, Mice, Knockout, Nicotinic Antagonists, Mice, alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review