Cited by 205Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsEstrogen and related hormone effectsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Estrogens and age-related memory decline in rodents: What have we learned and where do we go from here?

Open access
Frick, Karyn M.·2009·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

The question of whether ovarian hormone therapy can prevent or reduce age-related memory decline in menopausal women has been the subject of much recent debate. Although numerous studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of estrogen and/or progestin therapy for certain types of memory in menopausal women, recent clinical trials suggest that such therapy actually increases the risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Because rodent models have been frequently used to examine the effects of age and/or ovarian hormone deficiency on mnemonic function, rodent models of age-related hormone and memory decline may be useful in helping to resolve this issue. This review will focus on evidence suggesting that estradiol modulates memory, particularly hippocampal-dependent memory, in young and aging female rats and mice. Various factors affecting the mnemonic response to estradiol in aging females will be highlighted to illustrate the complications inherent to studies of estrogen therapy in aging females. Avenues for future development of estradiol-based therapies will also be discussed, and it is argued that an approach to drug development based on identifying the molecular mechanisms underlying estrogenic modulation of memory may lead to promising future treatments for reducing age-related mnemonic decline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.08.015

Cites

301 of 301 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frick, K. M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Frick, Karyn M.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
2-23
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136011008
Cited by
205
References
301
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 24
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG022525, AG022525)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 065460, R03MH065460)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
estradiol, age-related memory decline, ovarian hormone deficiency, menopause, estrogen therapy, hippocampal-dependent memory, dementia risk
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Brain, Environment, Estradiol, Estrogens, Female, Memory, Memory Disorders, Progestins, Spatial Behavior, Signal Transduction, Maze Learning, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review