Cited by 58Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchEpigenetics and DNA MethylationTreatment of Major Depression

CBD modulates DNA methylation in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus of mice exposed to forced swim

Sales, Amanda J., Guimarães, Francisco S., Joca, Sâmia R.L.·2020·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychotomimetic component of Cannabis sativa plant, shows therapeutic potential in psychiatric disorders, including depression. The molecular mechanisms underlying the antidepressant-like effects of CBD are not yet understood. Previous studies in differentiated skin cells demonstrated that CBD regulates DNA methylation, an overall repressive epigenetic mechanism. Both stress exposure and antidepressant treatment can modulate DNA methylation in the brain, and lead to gene expression changes associated with depression neurobiology. We investigated herein if the antidepressant effect of CBD could be associated with changes in DNA methylation in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus (HPC) of mice submitted to the forced swimming test (FST). Therefore, we assessed: i) the behavioral effects induced by CBD and DNA methylation inhibitors (DNMTi: 5-AzaD and RG108), alone or in association; ii) the effects induced by CBD and DNMTi in global DNA methylation and DNMT activity, in PFC and HPC. Results showed that treatment with CBD (10 mg/kg), 5-AzaD and RG108 (0.2 mg/kg) induced an antidepressant-like effect in the FST. Similar effects were observed after the combination of sub-effective doses of CBD (7 mg/kg) and 5-AzaD or CBD (7 mg/kg) and RG108 (0.1 mg/kg). Also, stress reduced DNA methylation and DNMT activity in the HPC and increased it in the PFC. CBD and DNMTi treatment prevented these changes in both brain structures. Altogether, our results indica…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112627

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sales, A. J., Guimarães, F. S., & Joca, S. R. L.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Joca, Sâmia R.L.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
388
Pages
112627
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3020345240
Cited by
58
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
cannabidiol, DNA methylation, depression, antidepressant-like effects, forced swim test, prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, hypomethylating agents, decitabine, RG108, epigenetics, stress
MeSH terms
Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Cannabidiol, Depression, Disease Models, Animal, Hippocampus, Male, Prefrontal Cortex, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review