Cited by 39Primate Behavior and EcologyChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Tests of planning and the Bischof-Köhler hypothesis in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)

Open access
Paxton, Regina, Hampton, Robert R.·2009·Behavioural Processes

Abstract

The Bischof-Köhler hypothesis posits that nonhuman animals cannot plan for future motivational states that differ from a current state. [Naqshbandi, M., Roberts, W.A., 2006. Anticipation of future events in squirrel monkeys Samiri scireus and rats Rattus norvegicus: tests of the Bischof-Köhler hypothesis. J. Comp. Psychol. 120, 345-357] found that two squirrel monkeys that were not thirsty at the time of choice reversed their preference for a larger amount of food when choice of a smaller amount alleviated future thirst. This apparent anticipation of future thirst contradicts the Bischof-Köhler hypothesis. We used the methods described by Naqshbandi and Roberts with rhesus monkey subjects and found that the monkeys did not alter their behavior in anticipation of future thirst. To assess which factors enhance and inhibit the ability to express planning, we then systematically modified the experimental design in four subsequent experiments and found that monkeys that were not thirsty acted to alleviate future thirst only when the delay between their behavior and the contingent outcome was brief. Taken together these results suggest that the inability of rhesus monkeys to display planning resulted from their inability to learn behavior-outcome associations across long-delay intervals as would be expected from traditional accounts of operant learning, rather than from failure to anticipate future motivational states as posited by the Bischof-Köhler hypothesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.016

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rats and Rhesus macaques appear to fail at the future planning task, while squirrel monkeys were successful.

    “While rats [162] and Rhesus macaques [163] appear to fail at this task, other monkeys (squirrel monkeys) were successful [162].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [163]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Keppel G Wickens TD 2004 Design and analysis, a researchers handbook Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River 611
  2. Thierry B Campbell CJ Fuentes A Mackinnon KC Panger M Bearder SK 2007 The Macques: A double-layered social organization Primates in perspective Oxford University Press New York 224 239

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paxton, R., & Hampton, R. R.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
Behavioural Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
238-246
ISSN
0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016265832
Cited by
39
References
25
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (RR-00 165, P51RR000165)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
planning, rhesus monkeys, thirst, food choice, delay discounting, operant conditioning
MeSH terms
Animals, Choice Behavior, Feeding Behavior, Learning, Macaca mulatta, Male, Motivation, Thinking, Thirst

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review