Cited by 93Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionChild and Animal Learning Development

New evidence for animal foresight?

Suddendorf, Thomas, Corballis, Michael C.·2008·Animal Behaviour

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.006

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both the caching and previous future planning paradigms have been criticized for not showing evidence of true foresight as seen in humans, or have failed to replicate.

    “both this and the previous paradigm have been criticized for not showing evidence of true foresight as seen in humans [164,165], or have failed to replicate [166].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [165]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Suddendorf, Thomas
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
75
Issue
5
Pages
e1-e3
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037163423
Cited by
93
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
future planning, animal cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review