CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 114Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesAesthetic Perception and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The human and animal baby schema effect: correlates of individual differences.

Lehmann, Vicky, Huis in‘t Veld, Elisabeth M.J., Vingerhoets, Ad J.J.M.·2013·Behavioural Processes
DOI 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.01.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We investigated the animal and human baby schema effect (BSE) in relation to gender, parental status, and individual features. In three, independent online surveys, conducted during three consecutive years, (Ntotal=1389), ratings of photographs of human and animal infants as well as of adults, sociodemographic variables (age, gender, parental status) and personality attributes (empathy, attachment, interpersonal closeness, narcissism, and need to belong) were assessed. We demonstrated that humans are sensitive to the baby schemata of both humans and animals and that both are weakly positively correlated. BSE is positively associated with female gender and (affective) empathy. Higher interpersonal closeness and need to belong were additionally connected specifically to the human BSE. In contrast, narcissism and insecure attachment were not related to the BSE, suggesting a robustness of this phenomenon to possible negative influences of these two personality attributes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.01.001

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 55 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lorenz, 1943, Die angeborenen Formen möglichen Erfahrung, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 5, 245

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–113 of 113

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lehmann, V., Huis in‘t Veld, E. M. J., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Vingerhoets, Ad J.J.M.
ORCID
Venue
Behavioural Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
94
Pages
99-108
ISSN
0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.beproc.2013.01.001
OpenAlex
W2021066063
Cited by
114
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
infants, individual differences, empathy, attachment, need to belong, narcissism, relationship closeness, gender differences, parental status
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Animals, Cues, Empathy, Female, Humans, Individuality, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review