The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The keratocyte: Corneal stromal cell with variable repair phenotypes
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Progress in corneal wound healing
Ljubimov, A. V., & Saghizadeh, M. (2015) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.002 · Cited by 872
Concise Review: Evidence for CD34 as a Common Marker for Diverse Progenitors
Sidney, L. E., Branch, M. J., Dunphy, S. E., Dua, H. S., & Hopkinson, A. (2014) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1661 · Cited by 872
Hinz, B. (2016) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2015.07.009 · Cited by 424
Fiber reinforced GelMA hydrogel to induce the regeneration of corneal stroma
Kong, B., Chen, Y., Liu, R., Liu, X., Liu, C., Shao, Z., Xiong, L., Liu, X., Sun, W., & Mi, S. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14887-9 · Cited by 319
Cellular and extracellular matrix modulation of corneal stromal opacity
Torricelli, A. A. M., & Wilson, S. E. (2014) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2014.09.013 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- West-Mays, J. A., & Dwivedi, D. J.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1625-1631
- ISSN
- 1357-2725 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042343633
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The keratocyte: Corneal stromal cell with variable repair phenotypes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biocel.2006.03.010
- The paper
- West-Mays, J. A., & Dwivedi, D. J. (2006). The keratocyte: Corneal stromal cell with variable repair phenotypes. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2006.03.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
