Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 455

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens

Open access
Davies, Zoe G., Fuller, Richard A., Loram, Alison, Irvine, Katherine N., Sims, Victoria, Gaston, Kevin J.·2009·Biological Conservation
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.016

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. Baker, 2006, Population estimates of birds in Great Britain and the United Kingdom, British Birds, 99, 25
  2. Barnes, 1949, The slugs in our gardens, New Biologist, 6, 29
  3. Beebee, 1997, Changes in dewpond numbers and amphibian diversity over 20 years on chalk downland in Sussex, England, Biological Conservation, 81, 215, 10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00002-5 · DOI
  4. Beebee, 2001, British wildlife and human numbers: the ultimate conservation issue?, British Wildlife, 13, 1
  5. Biggs, 1994, New approaches to the management of ponds, British Wildlife, 5, 273
  6. Bland, 2004, Birds breeding in British gardens: an underestimated population?, Bird Study, 51, 96, 10.1080/00063650409461340 · DOI
  7. Bolund, 1999, Ecosystem services in urban areas, Ecological Economics, 29, 293, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Boothby, 1997, A census of ponds in Cheshire, North West England, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 7, 75, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0755(199703)7:1<75::AID-AQC215>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
  9. British Trust for Ornithology, 2006. We Spend £200 Million a Year on Wild Bird Food, British Trust for Ornithology Press Release No. 2006/12/76. British Trust for Ornithology Press, Thetford.
  10. Brittingham, 1992, Does winter bird feeding promote dependency?, Journal of Field Ornithology, 63, 190
  11. Cannon, 2005, Trends in the use of private gardens by wild birds in Great Britain 1995–2002, Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 659, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01050.x · DOI
  12. Cowie, 1988, The provision of food and the use of bird feeders in suburban gardens, Bird Study, 35, 163, 10.1080/00063658809476985 · DOI
  13. Daniels, 2006, Does variation in garden characteristics influence the conservation of birds in suburbia?, Biological Conservation, 133, 326, 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dickman, 1987, Habitat fragmentation and vertebrate species richness in an urban environment, Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 337, 10.2307/2403879 · DOI
  15. Fernández-Juricic, 2000, Avifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscape, Conservation Biology, 14, 513, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98600.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. Fernández-Juricic, 2001, A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: case studies from southern and northern Europe, Biodiversity and Conservation, 10, 2023, 10.1023/A:1013133308987 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Fuller, 2008, Garden bird feeding predicts the structure of urban avian assemblages, Diversity and Distributions, 14, 131, 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00439.x · DOI
  18. Gaston, 2005, Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity, Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 395, 10.1007/s10531-004-6066-x · DOI · Paper page
  19. Gaston, 2005, Urban domestic gardens (IV): the extent of the resource and its associated features, Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 2249, 10.1007/s10531-004-9513-9 · DOI
  20. Gaston, 2007, Urban domestic gardens (XI): variation in urban wildlife gardening in the UK, Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 3227, 10.1007/s10531-007-9174-6 · DOI
  21. Glue, 2006, Variety at winter bird tables, Bird Populations, 7, 212
  22. Good, 2000, The value of gardening for wildlife. What contribution does it make to conservation?, British Wildlife, 12, 77
  23. Gregory, 1998, Large-scale habitat use of some declining British birds, Journal of Applied Ecology, 35, 785, 10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.355349.x · DOI
  24. Hartig, 1991, Restorative effects of natural environment experiences, Environment and Behaviour, 23, 3, 10.1177/0013916591231001 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Herzog, 1997, Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 165, 10.1006/jevp.1997.0051 · DOI
  26. Irvine, 2002, Greening healthcare: practicing as if the natural environment really mattered, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 8, 76
  27. Jokimäki, 1999, Occurrence of breeding bird species in urban parks: effects of park structure and broad scale variables, Urban Ecosystems, 3, 21, 10.1023/A:1009505418327 · DOI
  28. Jokimäki, 1993, Effects of urbanization on the breeding bird species richness in Finland: a biogeographical comparison, Ornis Fennica, 70, 71
  29. Jones, 2008, Feeding birds in our towns and cities: a global research opportunity, Journal of Avian Biology, 39, 265, 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2008.04271.x · DOI
  30. Katcher, 1987, Health and caring for living things, Anthrozoos, 1, 175, 10.2752/089279388787058461 · DOI
  31. Knight, 2005, An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species, Molecular Ecology, 14, 1811, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02540.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. Kuo, 2001, Coping with poverty: impacts of environment and attention in the inner city, Environment and Behaviour, 33, 5, 10.1177/00139160121972846 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Kuo, 2001, Environment and crime in the inner city. Does vegetation reduce crime?, Environment and Behaviour, 33, 343, 10.1177/00139160121973025 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Leather, 1998, Windows in the workplace, Environment and Behaviour, 30, 739, 10.1177/001391659803000601 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Lepczyk, 2004, Assessing landowner activities related to birds across rural-to-urban landscapes, Environmental Management, 33, 110, 10.1007/s00267-003-0036-z · DOI
  36. Linton, 2000, Botanical conservation value related to origin and management of ponds, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 10, 77, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0755(200003/04)10:2<77::AID-AQC391>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
  37. Loram, 2007, Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent and structure of the resource in five major cities, Landscape Ecology, 22, 601, 10.1007/s10980-006-9051-9 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Maas, 2006, Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 587, 10.1136/jech.2005.043125 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Macintyre, 2003, What features of the home and the area might help to explain observed relationships between housing tenure and health: evidence from the west of Scotland, Health and Place, 9, 207, 10.1016/S1353-8292(02)00040-0 · DOI
  40. Maller, 2005, Healthy nature healthy people: ‘contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations, Health Promotion International, 21, 45, 10.1093/heapro/dai032 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Mason, 2000, Thrushes now largely restricted to the built environment in eastern England, Diversity and Distributions, 6, 189, 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00084.x · DOI
  42. McKinney, 2002, Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation, Bioscience, 52, 883, 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  43. Meyer, 1992, Human population growth and global land-use cover change, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23, 6, 10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000351 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Miller, 2005, Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 430, 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Miotk, 1996, The naturalized garden – a refuge for animals? – first results, Zoologischer Anzeiger, 235, 101
  46. Moore, 1981, A prison environment’s effect on health care service demands, Journal of Environmental Systems, 11, 17, 10.2190/KM50-WH2K-K2D1-DM69 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Morley, 1944, A study of the ant fauna of a garden, 1934–42, Journal of Animal Ecology, 13, 123, 10.2307/1445 · DOI
  48. Oertli, 2002, Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity, Biological Conservation, 104, 59, 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00154-9 · DOI
  49. Osborne, 2008, Quantifying and comparing bumblebee nest densities in gardens and countryside habitats, Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 784, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01359.x · DOI
  50. Parsons, 1998, The view from the road: implications for stress recovery and immunisation, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 113, 10.1006/jevp.1998.0086 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Peach, 2004, Habitat selection by song thrushes in stable and declining farmland populations, Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 275, 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00892.x · DOI
  52. Pyle, 2003, Nature matrix: reconnecting people and nature, Oryx, 37, 206, 10.1017/S0030605303000383 · DOI
  53. Robb, 2008, Food for thought: supplementary feeding as a driver of ecological change in avian populations, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 476, 10.1890/060152 · DOI
  54. Rouen, 2001, Use of the terms ‘ponds’ and ‘pools’, Freshwater Forum, 17, 4
  55. Rudd, 2002, Importance of backyard habitat in a comprehensive biodiversity conservation strategy: a connectivity analysis of urban green spaces, Restoration Ecology, 10, 368, 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.02041.x · DOI · Paper page
  56. Savard, 2000, Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems, Landscape and Urban Planning, 48, 131, 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00037-2 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Sims, 2008, Avian assemblage structure and domestic cat densities in urban environments, Diversity and Distributions, 14, 387, 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00444.x · DOI
  58. Smith, 2005, Urban domestic gardens (VIII): environmental correlates of invertebrate species abundance, Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 2515, 10.1007/s10531-005-2784-y · DOI
  59. Smith, 2005, Urban domestic gardens (IX): composition and richness of the vascular plant flora, and implications for native biodiversity, Biological Conservation, 129, 312, 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.045 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Smith, 2005, Urban domestic gardens (VI): environmental correlates of invertebrate species richness, Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 2415, 10.1007/s10531-004-5014-0 · DOI
  61. Stilgoe, 2001, Gone barefoot lately?, American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 20, 243, 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00319-6 · DOI
  62. Stigsdotter, U.A., Grahn, P., 2004. A garden at your workplace may reduce stress, In: Dilani, A. (Ed.), Design and Health III – Health Promotion through Environmental Design Research Centre for Design and Health, Stockholm, pp. 147–157.
  63. Sullivan, 2004, The fruit of urban nature: vital neighbourhood spaces, Environment and Behaviour, 36, 678, 10.1177/0193841X04264945 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Takano, 2002, Urban residential environments and senior citizens longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable green spaces, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 913, 10.1136/jech.56.12.913 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Thompson, 2003, Urban domestic gardens (I): putting small-scale plant diversity in context, Journal of Vegetation Science, 14, 71, 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02129.x · DOI
  66. Thompson, 2004, Urban domestic gardens (III): composition and diversity of lawn floras, Journal of Vegetation Science, 15, 371, 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02274.x · DOI
  67. Tyrväinen, 1997, The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method, Landscape and Urban Planning, 37, 211, 10.1016/S0169-2046(97)80005-9 · DOI
  68. Ulrich, 1984, View through a window may influence recovery from surgery, Science, 224, 420, 10.1126/science.6143402 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Warren, 2008, Plants of a feather: spatial autocorrelation of gardening practices in suburban neighbourhoods, Biological Conservation, 141, 3, 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.10.005 · DOI

Cited by

See all 455

Metadata

Authors
Davies, Z. G., Fuller, R. A., Loram, A., Irvine, K. N., Sims, V., & Gaston, K. J.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
142
Issue
4
Pages
761-771
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.016
OpenAlex
W2145367475
Cited by
455
References
3
FWCI
17.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.