Cited by 8Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsAnimal Virus Infections StudiesVirology and Viral Diseases

Vesivirus 2117: Cell line infectivity range and effectiveness of amplification of a potential adventitious agent in cell culture used for biological production

Plavsic, Mark, Shick, Klaudia, Bergmann, Katherine F., Mallet, Laurent·2016·Biologicals

Abstract

Vesivirus 2117 (VV-2117) has been recently described as a contaminant of cell culture operations in several biologics manufacturing facilities. VV-2117 has been poorly studied and little information exists about its biology, pathogenicity and infectivity range in cell culture settings. In this study we evaluated the potential in vitro viral infectivity of VV-2117 using a range of established mammalian cell lines from various species, the effectiveness of virus amplification in CHO-K1 cells at differing infection levels, and the relative sensitivity of two test methods (cytopathic effect [CPE] and polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) to detect infection and viral amplification. Of eight cell culture systems studied, two originating from hamster (CHO-K1 and BHK-21) and one from canine (MDCK) were positive for CPE and also showed a marked increase of viral RNA in a reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) test. CHO-K1 cell cultures inoculated at 10, 1 and 0.1 genome copies per cell (gc/cell) showed both CPE and amplification of VV-2117 RNA, indicating that infection had occurred in these cultures. CHO-K1 cultures inoculated at 0.01, 0.001, 0.0001 and 0.00001 gc per cell showed neither CPE nor VV-2117, indicating that infection had not occurred. Therefore, the minimum dose necessary for infection of CHO-K1 cells was approximately 0.1 genome copies per cell. At any infection level where VV-2117 amplification was observed by RT-qPCR, the cultures also showed CPE. There was no low-level infection that could be detected by RT-qPCR without developing signs of CPE. However, the RT-qPCR assay appeared more sensitive in that it detected VV-2117 infection earlier than the onset of observable CPE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biologicals.2016.08.001

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plavsic, M., Shick, K., Bergmann, K. F., & Mallet, L.
Corresponding author
Plavsic, Mark
Venue
Biologicals
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
540-545
ISSN
1045-1056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2520830315
Cited by
8
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biologicals (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
cell culture contamination, viral replication, CHO-K1 cells, cytopathic effect, biopharmaceutical manufacturing, viral RNA detection, BHK-21 cells, MDCK cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Cricetulus, Dogs, Cricetinae, CHO Cells, Cell Culture Techniques, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Vesivirus, Madin Darby Canine Kidney Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review