Cited by 153biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer crystallization and propertiesBone Tissue Engineering Materials

The effect of crystallinity on the deformation mechanism and bulk mechanical properties of PLLA

Renouf-Glauser, Annette C., Rose, John, Farrar, David F., Cameron, Ruth Elizabeth·2005·Biomaterials

Abstract

Poly (l-lactide) is a widely studied biomaterial, currently approved for use in a range of medical devices, however, most in vitro studies have so far focussed upon either the bulk properties during degradation and/or deformation, or on the microstructure of the unloaded material during degradation. This study aimed to combine these approaches through the technique of simultaneous small-angle X-ray scattering and tensile testing at various stages of degradation up to 8 months, on material with a range of induced microstructures. Results showed that the amorphous material deformed by crazing in the dry, wet and degraded states, however, the mechanism by which the craze developed changed significantly on hydration. Despite this difference, there was little change in the bulk mechanical properties. Crystalline materials deformed through crystal-mediated deformation, with contributions from both cavitation and fibrillated shear, but surprisingly, differences in the length scales within the spherulitic structure caused by annealing at different temperatures had very little effect on the mechanism of deformation, though differences were seen in the bulk properties. Furthermore, hydration had little effect on the crystalline materials, though degradation over 8 months resulted in loss of mechanical properties for samples produced at higher annealing temperatures. In conclusion, the introduction of crystallinity had a huge effect on both bulk and microscopic properties of PLLA, but the spherulitic structure of the crystalline material affected the bulk properties significantly more than it did the micromechanism of deformation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.002

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Renouf-Glauser, A. C., Rose, J., Farrar, D. F., & Cameron, R. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Smith & Nephew (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Cameron, Ruth Elizabeth
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
26
Issue
29
Pages
5771-5782
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075491047
Cited by
153
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Smith and Nephew
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Keywords
poly(L-lactic acid), crystallinity, deformation mechanisms, bulk mechanical properties, polymer degradation, crazing, spherulitic structure, annealing temperature, hydration, cavitation
MeSH terms
Biocompatible Materials, Fourier Analysis, Materials Testing, Polyesters, Polymers, Scattering, Radiation, Stress, Mechanical, Temperature, Tensile Strength, Time Factors, Water, X-Ray Diffraction, X-Rays, Crystallography, X-Ray, Lactic Acid, Absorbable Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review