Cited by 260biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer crystallization and propertiesPolymer Foaming and Composites

Tailoring Impact Toughness of Poly(l-lactide)/Poly(ε-caprolactone) (PLLA/PCL) Blends by Controlling Crystallization of PLLA Matrix

Bai, Hongwei, Xiu, Hao, Gao, Jian, Deng, Hua, Zhang, Qin, Yang, Mingbo, Fu, Qiang·2012·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Melt blending poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) with various biodegradable polymers has been thought to be the most economic and effective route to toughen PLLA without compromising its biodegradability. Unfortunately, only very limited improvement in notched impact toughness can be achieved, although most of these blends show significant enhancement in tensile toughness. In this work, biodegradable poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) was used as an impact modifier to toughen PLLA and a nucleating agent was utilized to tailor the crystallization of PLLA matrix. Depending on the nucleating agent concentrations in the matrix and mold temperatures in injection molding, PLLA/PCL blends with a wide range of matrix crystallinity (10-50%) were prepared by practical injection molding. The results show that there is a linear relationship between PLLA matrix crystallinity and impact toughness. With the increase in PLLA crystalline content, toughening becomes much easier to achieve. PLLA crystals are believed to provide a path for the propagation of shear yielding needed for effective impact energy absorption, and then, excellent toughening effect can be obtained when these crystals percolate through the whole matrix. This investigation provides not only a new route to prepare sustainable PLLA products with good impact toughness but also a fresh insight into the importance of matrix crystallization in the toughening of semicrystalline polymers with a flexible polymer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/am201564f

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rate of growth of impact strength with PLA crystallinity increased with the increasing content of PCL in the blends.

    “The rate of this growth increased with the increasing content of PCL in the blends.”

    From Phase Structure, Compatibility, and Toughness of PLA/PCL Blends: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as Bai et al., 2012

  • The PLA/PCL (80/20) blend with PLA crystallinity about 50% showed impact strength more than 13 times higher than neat PLA.

    “The PLA/PCL (80/20) blend with the PLA crystallinity about 50% showed the impact strength more than 13 times higher in comparison with neat PLA.”

    From Phase Structure, Compatibility, and Toughness of PLA/PCL Blends: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as Bai et al., 2012

  • The notched Izod impact strength of neat PLA was almost independent of its crystallinity.

    “It was found that the notched Izod impact strength of neat PLA was almost independent of its crystallinity.”

    From Phase Structure, Compatibility, and Toughness of PLA/PCL Blends: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as Bai et al., 2012

  • The crystallinity of PLA in its blends processed by common procedures tends to be very low, typically lower than 10%.

    “Consequently, the crystallinity of PLA in its blends processed by common procedures tends to be very low, typically lower than 10% (Bai et al., 2012(Bai et al., , 2013;;Ostafinska et al., 2015Ostafinska et al., , 2017)).”

    From Phase Structure, Compatibility, and Toughness of PLA/PCL Blends: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as Bai et al., 2012

  • The impact strength of PLA/PCL blends grew with the crystallinity of PLA.

    “On the other hand, the impact strength of PLA/PCL blends grew with the crystallinity of PLA.”

    From Phase Structure, Compatibility, and Toughness of PLA/PCL Blends: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as Bai et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bai, H., Xiu, H., Gao, J., Deng, H., Zhang, Q., Yang, M., & Fu, Q.
Affiliations
Sichuan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Fu, Qiang
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2012-01-20
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
897-905
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2332818851
Cited by
260
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Foaming and Composites
Keywords
poly(L-lactic acid), polycaprolactone, impact toughness, toughening, nucleating agents, polymer crystallization, crystallinity, injection molding, shear yielding, impact energy absorption, biodegradable polymers, semicrystalline polymers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review