The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contact activation of blood-plasma coagulation
Open accessAbstract
This opinion identifies inconsistencies in the generally-accepted surface biophysics involved in contact activation of blood-plasma coagulation, reviews recent experimental work aimed at resolving inconsistencies, and concludes that this standard paradigm requires substantial revision to accommodate new experimental observations. Foremost among these new findings is that surface-catalyzed conversion of the blood zymogen factor XII (FXII, Hageman factor) to the enzyme FXIIa ( FXII→surfaceFXIIa, a.k.a. autoactivation) is not specific for anionic surfaces, as proposed by the standard paradigm. Furthermore, it is found that surface activation is moderated by the protein composition of the fluid phase in which FXII autoactivation occurs by what appears to be a protein adsorption-competition effect. Both of these findings argue against the standard view that contact activation of plasma coagulation is potentiated by assembly of activation-complex proteins (FXII, FXI, prekallikrein, and high-molecular-weight kininogen) directly onto activating surfaces (procoagulants) through specific protein/surface interactions. These new findings supplement the observation that adsorption behavior of FXII and FXIIa is not remarkably different from a wide variety of other blood proteins surveyed. Similarity in adsorption properties further undermines the idea that FXII and/or FXIIa are distinguished from other blood proteins by unusual adsorption properties resulting in chemically-specific interactions with activating anionic surfaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anderson, N. L., & Anderson, N. G. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r200007-mcp200 · Cited by 4,414
Cited by
Franz, S., Rammelt, S., Scharnweber, D., & Simon, J. C. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.078 · Cited by 1,391
Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections
(2021) · Indian Journal of Continuing Nursing Education · doi:10.4103/2230-7354.320831 · Cited by 855
Kolandaivelu, K., Swaminathan, R., Gibson, W. J., Kolachalama, V. B., Nguyen-Ehrenreich, K.-L., Giddings, V. L., Coleman, L., Wong, G. K., & Edelman, E. R. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.110.003210 · Cited by 802
The pathology of the foreign body reaction against biomaterials
Klopfleisch, R., & Jung, F. (2017) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.35958 · Cited by 524
The contact activation and kallikrein/kinin systems: pathophysiologic and physiologic activities
Schmaier, A. H. (2016) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.13194 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Vogler, E. A., & Siedlecki, C. A.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1857-1869
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065722574
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contact activation of blood-plasma coagulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.041
- The paper
- Vogler, E. A., & Siedlecki, C. A. (2009). Contact activation of blood-plasma coagulation. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.