Cited by 265Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsSilk-based biomaterials and applications3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Nucleation and growth of mineralized bone matrix on silk-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds

Open access
Bhumiratana, Sarindr, Grayson, Warren L., Castaneda, Andrea, Rockwood, Danielle N., Gil, Eun S., Kaplan, David L., Vunjak-Novakovic, Gordana·2011·Biomaterials

Abstract

We describe a composite hydroxyapatite (HA)-silk fibroin scaffold designed to induce and support the formation of mineralized bone matrix by human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) in the absence of osteogenic growth factors. Porous three-dimensional silk scaffolds were extensively used in our previous work for bone tissue engineering and showed excellent biodegradability and biocompatibility. However, silk is not an osteogenic material and has a compressive stiffness significantly lower than that of native bone. In the present study, we explored the incorporation of silk sponge matrices with HA (bone mineral) micro-particles to generate highly osteogenic composite scaffolds capable of inducing the in vitro formation of tissue-engineered bone. Different amounts of HA were embedded in silk sponges at volume fractions of 0%, 1.6%, 3.1% and 4.6% to enhance the osteoconductive activity and mechanical properties of the scaffolds. The cultivation of hMSCs in the silk/HA composite scaffolds under perfusion conditions resulted in the formation of bone-like structures and an increase in the equilibrium Young's modulus (up to 4-fold or 8-fold over 5 or 10 weeks of cultivation, respectively) in a manner that correlated with the initial HA content. The enhancement in mechanical properties was associated with the development of the structural connectivity of engineered bone matrix. Collectively, the data suggest two mechanisms by which the incorporated HA enhanced the formation of tissue engineered bone: through osteoconductivity of the material leading to increased bone matrix production, and by providing nucleation sites for new mineral resulting in the connectivity of trabecular-like architecture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.058

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhumiratana, S., Grayson, W. L., Castaneda, A., Rockwood, D. N., Gil, E. S., Kaplan, D. L., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
32
Issue
11
Pages
2812-2820
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020617826
Cited by
265
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 18
FWCI
15.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB 003210, R01EB003210, P41EB002520)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (DE-016525, R01DE016525)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
silk fibroin, hydroxyapatite, composite scaffolds, bone tissue engineering, human mesenchymal stem cells, osteoconductivity, mineral nucleation, scaffold mechanical properties, Young's modulus, trabecular bone microarchitecture, perfusion bioreactor
MeSH terms
Calcification, Physiologic, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Durapatite, Tissue Engineering, Silk, Tissue Scaffolds, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review