Cited by 80Hair Growth and DisordersTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Spontaneous hair follicle germ (HFG) formation in vitro, enabling the large-scale production of HFGs for regenerative medicine

Kageyama, Tatsuto, Yoshimura, Chisa, Myasnikova, Dina, Kataoka, Ken, Nittami, Tadashi, Maruo, Shoji, Fukuda, Junji·2018·Biomaterials

Abstract

Hair follicle morphogenesis is triggered by reciprocal interactions between hair follicle germ (HFG) epithelial and mesenchymal layers. Here, we developed a method for large-scale preparation of HFGs in vitro via self-organization of cells. We mixed mouse epidermal and mouse/human mesenchymal cells in suspension and seeded them in microwells of a custom-designed array plate. Over a 3-day culture period, cells initially formed a randomly distributed single cell aggregate and then spatially separated from each other, exhibiting typical HFG morphological features. These self-sorted hair follicle germs (ssHFGs) were shown to be capable of efficient hair-follicle and shaft generation upon intracutaneous transplantation into the backs of nude mice. This finding facilitated the large-scale preparation of approximately 5000 ssHFGs in a microwell-array chip made of oxygen-permeable silicone. We demonstrated that the integrity of the oxygen supply through the bottom of the silicone chip was crucial to enabling both ssHFG formation and subsequent hair shaft generation. Finally, spatially aligned ssHFGs on the chip were encapsulated into a hydrogel and simultaneously transplanted into the back skin of nude mice to preserve their intervening spaces, resulting in spatially aligned hair follicle generation. This simple ssHFG preparation approach is a promising strategy for improving current hair-regenerative medicine techniques.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.056

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We have reported an approach for engineering HFG-like aggregates in vitro through self-organization of embryonic dorsal epithelial and mesenchymal cells in a laboratory-made microwell array plate.

    “We have reported an approach for engineering HFG-like aggregates in vitro through the self-organization of embryonic dorsal epithelial and mesenchymal cells in a laboratory-made microwell array plate (14).”
  • In this approach, two types of rodent cells initially formed a single aggregate where the two cell types were distributed randomly and subsequently spatially separated and formed HFG-like structures during 3 days of culture.

    “In this approach, the two types of rodent cells initially formed a single aggregate where the two cell types were distributed randomly and subsequently spatially separated and formed HFG-like structures during 3 days of culture.”
  • HFGs generated hair follicles and shafts in vitro in long-term culture, but the appearance of hair follicles was quite rare.

    “Furthermore, HFGs generated hair follicles and shafts in vitro in a long-term culture, but the appearance of hair follicles was quite rare.”
  • When transplanted into the skin of nude mice, HFGs efficiently generated de novo hair follicles in a few weeks and represented normal hair cycles.

    “When transplanted into the skin of nude mice, the HFGs efficiently generated de novo hair follicles in a few weeks and represented normal hair cycles.”
  • A microdevice with an array of 1.0-mm-diameter round-bottom wells made of oxygen-permeable silicone rubber could produce hundreds to thousands of dumbbell-shaped HFGs under improved oxygen concentration conditions.

    “In our previous study, we showed that a microdevice with an array of 1.0-mm-diameter round-bottom wells made of oxygen-permeable silicone rubber could produce hundreds to thousands of dumbbell-shaped HFGs under improved oxygen concentration conditions (14).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kageyama, T., Yoshimura, C., Myasnikova, D., Kataoka, K., Nittami, T., Maruo, S., & Fukuda, J.
Affiliations
  • Yokohama National University (JP)
  • Okayama University of Science (JP)
Corresponding author
Fukuda, Junji
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
154
Pages
291-300
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767226147
Cited by
80
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • MEXT (16K14489)
  • Japanese Society for Alternatives to Animal Experiments
  • Asahi Glass Foundation
  • Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
hair follicle morphogenesis, self-organization, microwell arrays, hydrogel encapsulation, hair regrowth
MeSH terms
Animals, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Nude, Hair Follicle, Regenerative Medicine, Microtechnology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review