Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Periosteal matrix-derived hydrogel promotes bone repair through an early immune regulation coupled with enhanced angio- and osteogenesis

Qiu, Pengcheng, Li, Mobai, Chen, Kai, Fang, Bin, Chen, Pengfei, Tang, Zhibin, Lin, Xianfeng, Fan, Shunwu·2020·Biomaterials

Abstract

Bone healing is a complex physiological process initiated by early regulation of the inflammatory immunity and entails multiple events including angiogenesis, osteogenic differentiation, and biomineralization. Here, we fabricated an injectable periosteal extracellular matrix (PEM) hydrogel that dynamically integrates multiple biological functions and, therefore, acts at different stages of the fracture healing process. PEM hydrogels were fully characterized compared with a collagen I hydrogel. The effects of PEM hydrogels on the different phases of the healing process were assessed in vitro. PEM hydrogels induced the recruitment and M2-polarization of macrophages, promoted the differentiation of MSCs into endothelial-like cells, HUVEC tube formation, osteogenic differentiation of primary calvarial osteoblasts and MSCs, and mineralization after being immersed in simulated body fluid. The dynamic and multiphase effects of the hydrogels were evaluated using a rat critical-sized calvarial defect model in vivo. During the early phase of repair, PEM hydrogels facilitated the M1-to-M2 transition of macrophages. As bone repair progressed, PEM hydrogels promoted blood vessel migration, the development of relative larger blood vessels, and functional vascularization. These effects were also verified in a subcutaneous embedding model. Eventually, PEM hydrogels promoted mature bone formation in large bone defects to a greater extent than collagen I hydrogels. These biological effects coordinated well with the natural process of bone regeneration. Thus, PEM hydrogels may serve as promising biomaterials in bone tissue engineering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119552

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 338

Metadata

Authors
Qiu, P., Li, M., Chen, K., Fang, B., Chen, P., Tang, Z., Lin, X., & Fan, S.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
227
Pages
119552
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981187323
Cited by
338
References
7
FWCI
11.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Periosteal matrix-derived hydrogel promotes bone repair through an early immune regulation coupled with enhanced angio- and osteogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119552
The paper
Qiu, P., Li, M., Chen, K., Fang, B., Chen, P., Tang, Z., Lin, X., & Fan, S. (2020). Periosteal matrix-derived hydrogel promotes bone repair through an early immune regulation coupled with enhanced angio- and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119552

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.