Cited by 334Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAttachment and Relationship DynamicsInfant Health and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Functional Neuroanatomy of Maternal Love: Mother’s Response to Infant’s Attachment Behaviors

Noriuchi, Madoka, Kikuchi, Yoshiaki, Senoo, Atsushi·2008·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Maternal love, which may be the core of maternal behavior, is essential for the mother-infant attachment relationship and is important for the infant's development and mental health. However, little has been known about these neural mechanisms in human mothers. We examined patterns of maternal brain activation in response to infant cues using video clips.Methods We performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements while 13 mothers viewed video clips, with no sound, of their own infant and other infants of approximately 16 months of age who demonstrated two different attachment behaviors (smiling at the infant's mother and crying for her).Results We found that a limited number of the mother's brain areas were specifically involved in recognition of the mother's own infant, namely orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), periaqueductal gray, anterior insula, and dorsal and ventrolateral parts of putamen. Additionally, we found the strong and specific mother's brain response for the mother's own infant's distress. The differential neural activation pattern was found in the dorsal region of OFC, caudate nucleus, right inferior frontal gyrus, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (PFC), anterior cingulate, posterior cingulate, thalamus, substantia nigra, posterior superior temporal sulcus, and PFC.Conclusions Our results showed the highly elaborate neural mechanism mediating maternal love and diverse and complex maternal behaviors for vigilant protectiveness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.018

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 42 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–108 of 108

Metadata

Authors
Noriuchi, M., Kikuchi, Y., & Senoo, A.
Affiliations
Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP)
Corresponding author
Noriuchi, Madoka
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
415-423
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051071356
Cited by
334
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 26
FWCI
19.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
maternal love, maternal attachment, infant distress, orbitofrontal cortex, periaqueductal gray, anterior insula, putamen, caudate nucleus, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, substantia nigra, superior temporal sulcus, maternal behavior
MeSH terms
Arousal, Brain, Female, Humans, Infant, Love, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Maternal Behavior, Mother-Child Relations, Nerve Net, Object Attachment, Prefrontal Cortex, Infant Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review