Childhood Adversity Is Associated with Left Basal Ganglia Dysfunction During Reward Anticipation in Adulthood
Open accessAbstract
Background Childhood adversity increases the risk of psychopathology, but the neurobiological mechanisms underlying this vulnerability are not well-understood. In animal models, early adversity is associated with dysfunction in basal ganglia regions involved in reward processing, but this relationship has not been established in humans. Methods Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to examine basal ganglia responses to: 1) cues signaling possible monetary rewards and losses; and 2) delivery of monetary gains and penalties, in 13 young adults who experienced maltreatment before age 14 years and 31 nonmaltreated control subjects. Results Relative to control subjects, individuals exposed to childhood adversity reported elevated symptoms of anhedonia and depression, rated reward cues less positively, and displayed a weaker response to reward cues in the left globus pallidus. There were no group differences in right hemisphere basal ganglia response to reward cues or in basal ganglia response to loss cues, no-incentive cues, gains, or penalties. Conclusions Results indicate that childhood adversity in humans is associated with blunted subjective responses to reward-predicting cues as well as dysfunction in left basal ganglia regions implicated in reward-related learning and motivation. This dysfunction might serve as a diathesis that contributes to the multiple negative outcomes and psychopathologies associated with childhood adversity. The findings suggest that interventions that target motivation and goal-directed action might be useful for reducing the negative consequences of childhood adversity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Functional MRI studies show differences in centrally-driven reward processing that could mediate ELA-related risk of psychopathologies and substance use-related illnesses.
“Functional MRI studies show differences in centrally-driven reward processing that could mediate ELA-related risk of psychopathologies and substance use-related illnesses [40, 41].”
From Biological embedding of childhood adversity: from physiological mechanisms to clinical implications (2017) · cites this paper as [41]
Similar findings have been observed in prospective cohorts following childhood adversity, suggestive of a possible causal relationship between childhood adversity and alterations of the dopamine system.
“and similar findings have been observed in prospective cohorts following childhood adversity (Dillon et al., 2009) suggestive of a possible causal relationship between childhood adversity and alterations of the dopamine system.”
From The effects of psychosocial stress on dopaminergic function and the acute stress response (2019) · cites this paper as Dillon et al., 2009
People with a history of early-life maltreatment show dampened behavioral reward responsiveness and reduced activation in striatal structures.
“Dillon et al., (2009) found that participants with a history of early-life maltreatment displayed dampened behavioral responsiveness to reward and reduced activation in striatal structures.”
From Reduced nucleus accumbens reactivity and adolescent depression following early-life stress (2013) · cites this paper as Dillon et al., (2009)
Previous reports suggest decreased striatal activity during reward anticipation in adults and adolescents with a history of childhood adversity.
“Our finding of reduced activation in the ventral striatum is largely consistent with previous reports, suggesting decreased striatal activity during reward anticipation in adults and adolescents with a history of childhood adversity.36–39”
From Ventral striatum dysfunction in children and adolescents with reactive attachment disorder: functional MRI study (2015) · cites this paper as [37]
A previous fMRI study showed significantly decreased left basal ganglia activity during reward anticipation, which was associated with anhedonia symptoms in adulthood.
“Similarly, a previous fMRI study assessing the effects of early-life maltreatment on reward-related learning37 showed significantly decreased left basal ganglia activity during reward anticipation, which was associated with anhedonia symptoms in adulthood.”
From Ventral striatum dysfunction in children and adolescents with reactive attachment disorder: functional MRI study (2015) · cites this paper as [37]
Four monetary incentive delay studies reported lower basal ganglia activity during reward anticipation in people exposed to institutionalization or early adversity before adolescence.
“Using the monetary incentive delay task, four studies demonstrated decreased activity in regions of basal ganglia during the anticipation phase, suggesting reduced approach motivation in individuals who were exposed to institutionalization or early life adversity prior to adolescence (Boecker et al., 2014; Boecker-Schlier et al., 2016; Dillon et al., 2009; Mehta et al., 2010).”
From The effects of early life stress on reward processing (2018) · cites this paper as Dillon et al., 2009
Two studies reported longer reaction times on the monetary incentive delay task in people with prior ELS, while children with reactive attachment disorder had shorter reaction times on a gambling task; other studies either did not assess behavior or found no differences.
“Dillon et al. (2009) and Boeker et al. (2014) found increased reaction times in individuals with prior ELS in the monetary incentive delay task, while decreased reaction times were noted in children with reactive attachment disorder in a gambling task (Takiguchi et al., 2015), although the remainder of studies either did not measure behavior (Casement et al., 2015, 2014; Goff et al., 2013; Hanson”
From The effects of early life stress on reward processing (2018) · cites this paper as Dillon et al., 2009
Many human studies link lower basal ganglia activation during reward anticipation or receipt to depressive symptoms, and this activation often mediates the ELS-depression relationship.
“in many of the human studies reviewed, decreased activation in regions of the basal ganglia to the anticipation or receipt of reward was not only associated with depressive symptoms (Dillon et al., 2009; Goff et al., 2013), but often found to mediate the relationship between ELS and depression (Corral-Frías et al., 2015; Hanson et al., 2015).”
From The effects of early life stress on reward processing (2018) · cites this paper as Dillon et al., 2009
fMRI studies have linked ELA to blunted subjective responses to reward-predicting cues and to altered connectivity in the extended reward network, leading to increased vulnerability to FA and obesity later in life.
“Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have linked ELA to blunted subjective responses to reward-predicting cues [29], and to altered connectivity in the extended reward network, leading to increased vulnerability to FA and obesity later in life [30].”
From Food Addiction and Psychosocial Adversity: Biological Embedding, Contextual Factors, and Public Health Implications (2020) · cites this paper as [29]
Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have linked early life adversity to blunted subjective responses to reward-predicting cues and dysfunction in the left basal ganglia regions implicated in reward-related learning and motivation.
“Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have linked ELA to blunted subjective responses to reward-predicting cues and dysfunction in the left basal ganglia regions implicated in reward-related learning and motivation [121].”
From Separating the Signal from the Noise: How Psychiatric Diagnoses Can Help Discern Food Addiction from Dietary Restraint (2020) · cites this paper as [121]
This case illustrates the link between ELA and FA which is likely mediated by biological mechanisms including altered DA signaling.
“This case illustrates the link between ELA and FA which is likely mediated by biological mechanisms including altered DA signaling [121,122,192,193,194].”
From Separating the Signal from the Noise: How Psychiatric Diagnoses Can Help Discern Food Addiction from Dietary Restraint (2020) · cites this paper as [121]
ELA leads to weaker reward responsivity, and deprivation may increase substance use to overcome this blunted reward response.
“Behavioral and neurobiological studies indicate that ELA leads to blunted reward responsivity (i.e. lower neural response to reward in reward-processing brain regions such as the ventral striatum (VS)), an effect that persists across the lifespan.67–70”
From Early life adversity and health-risk behaviors: Proposed psychological and neural mechanisms (2018) · cites this paper as [67]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 370
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [1]Dube SR Anda RF Felitti VJ Chapman DP Williamson DF Giles WH Childhood abuse, household dysfunction, and the risk of attempted suicide throughout the life span: findings from the Adverse Childhood Experiences study JAMA 2001 286 3089 3096 11754674
- [34]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured clinical interviews for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID) 1995 American Psychiatric Press Washington, DC
- Authors
- Dillon, D. G., Holmes, A. J., Birk, J. L., Brooks, N., Lyons-Ruth, K., & Pizzagalli, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pizzagalli, Diego A.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 206-213
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2883459
- OpenAlex
- W2148389863
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH068376, R21MH078979, R01 MH68376, R01MH062030)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- childhood adversity, child abuse, basal ganglia, globus pallidus, reward anticipation, reward processing, anhedonia, depression, motivation, diathesis, psychopathology risk
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Basal Ganglia, Mental Disorders, Brain Mapping, Cues, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reaction Time, Regression Analysis, Reward, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review