The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Really Relieve Medication-Resistant Auditory Verbal Hallucinations? Negative Results from a Large Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background Several studies have applied low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) directed at the left temporoparietal area (TP) for the treatment of auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH), but findings on efficacy are inconsistent. Furthermore, recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies indicate that the left TP is not a general focus of activation during the experience of AVH. The aims of this study are twofold: to investigate the effects of rTMS on AVH in a double blind, randomized, sham-controlled study; and to investigate whether the efficacy can be improved when rTMS is guided by individual fMRI scans of hallucinatory activation.Methods Sixty-two patients with medication-resistant AVH were randomized over three conditions: rTMS targeted at the area of maximal hallucinatory activation calculated from individual fMRI scans during AVH, rTMS directed at the left TP, and sham treatment. Repetitive TMS was applied during 15 sessions of 20 min each, at 1 Hz and 90% of the individual motor threshold. The severity of AVH and other psychotic symptoms were monitored during treatment and 3-month follow-up, with the Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales.Results The effects of fMRI-guided rTMS and left TP rTMS on the severity of AVH were comparable to those of sham treatment. No differences in severity of general psychotic symptoms were found among the three treatment conditions.Conclusions Low-frequency rTMS administered to the left TP or to the site of maximal hallucinatory activation is not more effective for medication-resistant AVH than sham treatment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Notably, a relatively large randomized controlled trial (N = 62) failed to find any significant advantage of active rTMS over sham stimulation”
From Auditory verbal hallucinations as atypical inner speech monitoring, and the potential of neurostimulation as a treatment option (2013) · cites this paper as Slotema et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Of the three studies discussed here that have achieved adequate power, one finds no effect of neurostimulation (Slotema et al., 2011), and the other two originate from the same institution (Hoffman et al., 2005, 2013).”
From Auditory verbal hallucinations as atypical inner speech monitoring, and the potential of neurostimulation as a treatment option (2013) · cites this paper as Slotema et al., 2011
Citations
Cites
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/13.2.261 · Cited by 21,378
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
HADDOCK, G., McCARRON, J., TARRIER, N., & FARAGHER, E. B. (1999) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291799008661 · Cited by 1,461
Cerebral location of international 10–20 system electrode placement
Homan, R. W., Herman, J. H., & Purdy, P. D. (1987) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(87)90206-9 · Cited by 1,444
Designing Experiments and Analysing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective.
Freeman, G. H., Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1991) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532173 · Cited by 1,229
Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective, Third Edition
Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 975
Designing experiments and analyzing data: a model comparison perspective
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-2192 · Cited by 673
Slotema, C. W., Blom, J. D., Hoek, H. W., & Sommer, I. E. C. (2010) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.08m04872gre · Cited by 584
Characterizing Dynamic Brain Responses with fMRI: A Multivariate Approach
Friston, K. J., Frith, C., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Turner, R. (1995) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1995.1019 · Cited by 568
Hoffman, R. E., Hawkins, K. A., Gueorguieva, R. V., Boutros, N. N., Rachid, F., Carroll, K. M., & Krystal, J. H. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.1.49 · Cited by 520
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lefaucheur, J.-P., Aleman, A., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., Brunelin, J., Di Lazzaro, V., Filipović, S. R., Grefkes, C., Hasan, A., Hummel, F. C., et al. (2020) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002 · Cited by 2,382
Lefaucheur, J.-P., André-Obadia, N., Antal, A., Ayache, S. S., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., Cantello, R. M., Cincotta, M., de Carvalho, M., De Ridder, D., et al. (2014) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021 · Cited by 2,119
“The studies summarized in Table 12 provided highly controversial results, with 7 positive studies (two Class II and 5 Class III) involving a total of 118 patients treated by active rTMS and 7 negative studies (two Class II, including the largest series to date (Slotema et al., 2011) and 5 Class III) covering altogethe…”
Brunelin, J., Mondino, M., Gassab, L., Haesebaert, F., Gaha, L., Suaud-Chagny, M.-F., Saoud, M., Mechri, A., & Poulet, E. (2012) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11071091 · Cited by 520
Hyde, J., Carr, H., Kelley, N. J., Seneviratne, R., Reed, C., Parlatini, V., Garner, M. J., Solmi, M., Rosson, S., Cortese, S., et al. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01524-8 · Cited by 270
Modinos, G., Costafreda, S. G., van Tol, M., McGuire, P. K., Aleman, A., & Allen, P. (2012) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.01.009 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Slotema, C. W., Blom, J. D., de Weijer, A. D., Diederen, K. M., Goekoop, R., Looijestijn, J., Daalman, K., Rijkaart, A.-M., Kahn, R. S., Hoek, H. W., & Sommer, I. E. C.
- Affiliations
- Parnassia Groep (NL)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Slotema, Christina W.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 450-456
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098660547
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NWO ZonMW (Dutch Scientific Research Foundation-Dutch National Institute of Health Research
- Stichting tot Steun (Dutch Support Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Keywords
- auditory verbal hallucinations, low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, left temporoparietal cortex, sham-controlled treatment, treatment efficacy, psychotic symptoms
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Double-Blind Method, Drug Resistance, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
