Cited by 584Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Should We Expand the Toolbox of Psychiatric Treatment Methods to Include Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)?: A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of rTMS in Psychiatric Disorders

Slotema, Christina W., Blom, Jan Dirk, Hoek, Hans W., Sommer, Iris E. C.·2010·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a safe treatment method with few side effects. However, efficacy for various psychiatric disorders is currently not clear. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed from 1966 through October 2008 using PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase Psychiatry, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and PsycINFO. The following search terms were used: transcranial magnetic stimulation, TMS, repetitive TMS, psychiatry, mental disorder, psychiatric disorder, anxiety disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, catatonia, mania, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, psychosis, posttraumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, Tourette's syndrome, bulimia nervosa, and addiction. STUDY SELECTION: Data were obtained from randomized, sham-controlled studies of rTMS treatment for depression (34 studies), auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH, 7 studies), negative symptoms in schizophrenia (7 studies), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD, 3 studies). Studies of rTMS versus electroconvulsive treatment (ECT, 6 studies) for depression were meta-analyzed. DATA EXTRACTION: Standardized mean effect sizes of rTMS versus sham were computed based on pretreatment-posttreatment comparisons. DATA SYNTHESIS: The mean weighted effect size of rTMS versus sham for depression was 0.55 (P < .001). Monotherapy with rTMS was more effective than rTMS as adjunctive to antidepressant medication. ECT was superior to rTMS in the treatment of depression (mean weighted effect size -0.47, P = .004). In the treatment of AVH, rTMS was superior to sham treatment, with a mean weighted effect size of 0.54 (P < .001). The mean weighted effect size for rTMS versus sham in the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia was 0.39 (P = .11) and for OCD, 0.15 (P = .52). Side effects were mild, yet more prevalent with high-frequency rTMS at frontal locations. CONCLUSIONS: It is time to provide rTMS as a clinical treatment method for depression, for auditory verbal hallucinations, and possibly for negative symptoms. We do not recommend rTMS for the treatment of OCD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.08m04872gre

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slotema, C. W., Blom, J. D., Hoek, H. W., & Sommer, I. E. C.
Affiliations
  • Parnassia Groep (NL)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Slotema, Christina W.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2010-03-09
Volume
71
Issue
07
Pages
873-884
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149866856
Cited by
584
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 57
FWCI
33.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, depression, auditory verbal hallucinations, obsessive-compulsive disorder, electroconvulsive therapy, treatment efficacy, adverse effects, mental illness, adjunctive antidepressant therapy, high-frequency rTMS, Tourette syndrome, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, bulimia nervosa
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Combined Modality Therapy, Depressive Disorder, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Hallucinations, Humans, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review