Cited by 53Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Neurofunctional Effects of Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine in Boys with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder During Time Discrimination

Smith, Anna, Cubillo, Ana, Barrett, Nadia, Giampietro, Vincent, Simmons, Andrew, Brammer, Mick, Rubia, Katya·2013·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background The catecholamine agonists methylphenidate and atomoxetine effectively treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Furthermore, dopamine agonists have shown to improve time estimation in ADHD, a core cognitive deficit. However, few have compared the effects of methylphenidate and atomoxetine on brain function in ADHD, and none during time estimation. Using single dose challenges, we investigated shared and drug-specific effects in ADHD adolescents on the neural substrates of time discrimination (TD). Methods Twenty ADHD adolescent male subjects were compared in a randomized double-blind cross-over design after single doses of methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and placebo in functional magnetic resonance imaging during TD. Normalization effects were assessed by comparing brain activation under each drug condition with that of 20 healthy age-matched control subjects. Results Relative to control subjects, patients under placebo showed TD deficits and reduced activation of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC)/insula, inferior frontal cortex, and supplementary motor area. Performance differences were normalized only by methylphenidate, relative to both atomoxetine and placebo. Both medications, however, significantly upregulated right VLPFC/insula activation within patients and normalized its underactivation in ADHD boys under placebo relative to control subjects. The supplementary motor area and inferior frontal cortex activation differences that were observe…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.03.030

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the authors' four fMRI studies comparing single dosages of methylphenidate and atomoxetine versus placebo on brain activation in children and adolescents with ADHD, reduced activation in frontal, parietal, temporal, and insular-striatal regions during cognitive tasks can be increased (and even normalized) by both stimulant and non-stimulant medications.

    “Thus, in our four fMRI studies comparing the effects of single dosages of methylphenidate and atomoxetine versus placebo on brain activation in children and adolescents with ADHD (45, 85–87), we found that reduced activation in frontal, parietal, temporal, and insular-striatal regions during cognitive tasks can be increased (and even normalized) by both stimulant and non-stimulant medications.”
  • ROI fMRI studies found methylphenidate significantly enhanced right IFC activation during time discrimination together with atomoxetine.

    “and during time discrimination together with atomoxetine (24).”
  • Most fMRI studies found methylphenidate to have a positive effect on brain activation, but only some observed performance improvement.

    “While most fMRI studies found methylphenidate to have a positive effect on brain activation, only some studies observed performance improvement 18, 21, 24, 25, 26, 74, 75, likely reflecting the superior sensitivity of fMRI relative to behavior to detect pharmacologic effects or the relatively small subject numbers of fMRI studies, underpowered for performance effects.”
  • Acute methylphenidate normalized the underactivation in right IFC in ADHD patients under placebo compared with healthy control subjects during inhibition and timing processes.

    “Furthermore, acute methylphenidate normalized the underactivation in right IFC that was observed in ADHD patients under placebo compared with healthy control subjects during inhibition and timing processes [see also 23, 24], which has also been observed previously during interference inhibition (17), motor inhibition 18, 23, WM (72), and TD (4) (Table S2 in Supplement 1).”
  • The new whole-brain analysis of three previously published fMRI ROI datasets comparing methylphenidate relative to placebo only was included in the meta-analysis.

    “The new whole-brain analysis of our three previously published fMRI ROI datasets 3, 22, 24, comparing methylphenidate relative to placebo only, was included in the meta-analysis.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, A., Cubillo, A., Barrett, N., Giampietro, V., Simmons, A., Brammer, M., & Rubia, K.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, Anna
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
74
Issue
8
Pages
615-622
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990810316
Cited by
53
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, methylphenidate, atomoxetine, temporal discrimination, time estimation, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, insula, supplementary motor area, inferior frontal cortex, catecholamine agonists, dopamine agonists, stimulants, adolescents
MeSH terms
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride, Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Brain Mapping, Discrimination, Psychological, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Methylphenidate, Propylamines, Time Factors, Prefrontal Cortex, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review