The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remember the Future II: Meta-analyses and Functional Overlap of Working Memory and Delay Discounting
Open accessAbstract
Previously we showed that working memory training decreased the discounting of future rewards in stimulant addicts without affecting a go/no-go task. While a relationship between delay discounting and working memory is consistent with other studies, the unique brain regions of plausible causality between these two abilities have yet to be determined. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses were performed on foci from studies of delay discounting (DD = 449), working memory (WM = 452), finger tapping (finger tapping = 450), and response inhibition (RI = 450). Activity maps from relatively less (finger tapping) and more (RI) demanding executive tasks were contrasted with maps of DD and WM. Overlap analysis identified unique functional coincidence between DD and WM. The anterior cingulate cortex was engaged by all tasks. Finger tapping largely engaged motor-related brain areas. In addition to motor-related areas, RI engaged frontal brain regions. The right lateral prefrontal cortex was engaged by RI, DD, and WM and was contrasted out of overlap maps. A functional cluster in the posterior portion of the left lateral prefrontal cortex emerged as the largest location of unique overlap between DD and WM. A portion of the left lateral prefrontal cortex is a unique location where delay discounting and working memory processes overlap in the brain. This area, therefore, represents a therapeutic target for improving behaviors that rely on the integration of the recent past with the foreseeable future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is also consistent with the network engaged by delay discounting (41)”
From Understanding heterogeneity in clinical cohorts using normative models: Beyond case-control studies (2016) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“These correlations are substantiated by brain areas of functional overlap during tasks of WM and DD (Wesley & Bickel, 2014).”
From Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Wesley & Bickel, 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Working memory: Looking back and looking forward
Baddeley, A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1201 · Cited by 5,200
N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies.
Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20131 · Cited by 3,560
Yatham, L. N., & Malhi, G. S. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780199562305.001.0001 · Cited by 3,515
Anterior Cingulate Cortex, Error Detection, and the Online Monitoring of Performance
Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.747 · Cited by 3,273
Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards
McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100907 · Cited by 3,089
The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice
Kable, J. W., & Glimcher, P. W. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2007 · Cited by 1,916
Neuroimaging studies of working memory:
Wager, T. D., & Smith, E. E. (2003) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.3.4.255 · Cited by 1,889
An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement.
Commons, M. L., Mazur, J., Nevin, J. A., & Rachlin, H. C. (1987) · doi:10.4324/9781315825502-11 · Cited by 1,842
The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style
Davidson, R. J., & Irwin, W. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01265-0 · Cited by 1,684
Aron, A. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4682-05.2006 · Cited by 1,630
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Shamosh, 2008, Individual differences in delay discounting: Relation to intelligence, working memory, and anterior prefrontal cortex, Psychol Sci, 19, 904, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02175.x · DOI · Paper page
- Menon, 2001, Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task, Hum Brain Mapp, 12, 131, 10.1002/1097-0193(200103)12:3<131::AID-HBM1010>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
- Monterosso, 2007, Frontoparietal cortical activity of methamphetamine-dependent and comparison subjects performing a delay discounting task, Hum Brain Mapp, 28, 383, 10.1002/hbm.20281 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On testing for spatial correspondence between maps of human brain structure and function
Alexander-Bloch, A. F., Shou, H., Liu, S., Satterthwaite, T. D., Glahn, D. C., Shinohara, R. T., Vandekar, S. N., & Raznahan, A. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.070 · Cited by 947
Understanding heterogeneity in clinical cohorts using normative models: Beyond case-control studies
Marquand, A. F., Rezek, I., Buitelaar, J., & Beckmann, C. F. (2016) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.12.023 · Cited by 683
A dual‐systems perspective on addiction: contributions from neuroimaging and cognitive training
McClure, S. M., & Bickel, W. K. (2014) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12561 · Cited by 209
Can delay discounting deliver on the promise of RDoC?
Lempert, K. M., STEINGLASS, J. E., Pinto, A., Kable, J. W., & Simpson, H. B. (2018) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291718001770 · Cited by 193
Verdejo‐García, A., García–Fernández, G., & Dom, G. (2019) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2019.21.3/gdom · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Wesley, M. J., & Bickel, W. K.
- Affiliations
- Carilion Clinic (US)
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wesley, Michael J.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 435-448
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3943930
- OpenAlex
- W2073860106
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 161
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA012997, R01DA024080, R01DA030241)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- delay discounting, working memory, response inhibition, finger tapping, anterior cingulate cortex, lateral prefrontal cortex, executive function, stimulant use disorder, reward processing, treatment goals
- MeSH terms
- Brain Mapping, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Inhibition, Psychological, Memory, Short-Term, Prefrontal Cortex, Delay Discounting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
